Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Colorado Senate Passes Bill 197 – No Conviction Needed to Confiscate Firearms

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    344

    Colorado Senate Passes Bill 197 – No Conviction Needed to Confiscate Firearms

    I doubt this will pas the house but it does show that Colorado is going down the toilet. I say its high time to clean out the barn.


    "Colorado Senate Passes Bill 197 – No Conviction Needed to Confiscate Firearms

    The Colorado Senate passed Senate Bill 197 on a 20-15 party line vote on Monday. The Bill, sponsored by Sen. Evie Hudak, D-Westminster, will ban domestic violence abusers – both convicted as well as those who have been accused of domestic violence – from possessing firearms and came with much objection from Republican lawmakers including Senate Minority Leader Bill Cadman, R-Colorado Springs, who said on Friday that “the bill is ripe for abuse. It’s ripe for confiscation of personal private property.” Cadman asked for more time to work with democrats on the measure stating that it was a Bill republicans wanted to support but couldn’t in it’s present form – but was denied.

    Supporters of the measure presented an argument detailing statistics claiming that 13 people were shot in 2011 by domestic violence offenders who under federal law should not have been in possession of firearms.

    The Bill requires courts to order anyone subject to a domestic violence protection order or anyone who’s actually been convicted of domestic violence to surrender their guns within 24 hours. The Denver Post on Monday reported that the process of relinquishment involved “storing” the weapons with law enforcement or a firearms dealer or simply selling the guns to the dealer. The person who gave up their firearms must then show a “receipt of relinquishment” to the court. The right to the guns could be restored in the event that a protection order was lifted.

    GOP senators said the Bill essentially amounted to gun confiscation, arguing that protective orders weren’t convictions and only those actually convicted of a violent crime should be subjected to any loss of constitutional rights.

    Senate Bill 197 now moves on to the House."

    Full article:

    http://dcxposed.com/2013/03/11/color...cate-firearms/

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    El Paso County, Colorado
    Posts
    309
    Look at the date on this... and the party-line vote of 20-15 (that was the right ratio BEFORE the recalls). You are bringing up a story from last year!

  3. #3
    Regular Member JamesB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lakewood, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    703
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveInCO View Post
    Look at the date on this... and the party-line vote of 20-15 (that was the right ratio BEFORE the recalls). You are bringing up a story from last year!
    Oh thank the Gods.
    I read that opening line about it being sponsored by Evil Hudak and was about to have a fit. Damn. Didn't we get rid of that lying $#!t? Oh good. Last year... Breathe.
    Last edited by JamesB; 03-13-2014 at 08:59 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •