• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Reckless Gunfire Causing Injuries to be a Felony in Virginia

Rusty Young Man

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
1,548
Location
Árida Zona
On a barely, just barely, related note to the above. HI cops want be allowed to engage in hanky panky with "women of the night".....uh, I mean be exempted from the law that makes such hanky panky unlawful. This exemption is required so that "undercover" cops can fight crime.

Hell, that's a good thing. Give em all AIDS and clean up the gene pool.:uhoh:

More than likely, the taxpayers will also end up having to foot the bill to buy "protection equipment intended to aid police in their duties".:lol:
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Can we stay on topic please.

The OP of this thread is "Reckless Gunfire Causing Injuries to be a Felony in Virginia."
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Would he be charged with a felony if the classroom was in Virginia???

www.youtube.com/watch?v=am-Qdx6vky0
Might, maybe, could be. Would be up to the CA I would presume.

The bill was initially intended to curb celebratory gun fire, but seems to have drifted into no man's land.

It's not like we didn't have enough gun laws already that admirably covered the problem.
 

DocWalker

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
1,922
Location
Mountain Home, Idaho, USA
Might, maybe, could be. Would be up to the CA I would presume.

The bill was initially intended to curb celebratory gun fire, but seems to have drifted into no man's land.

It's not like we didn't have enough gun laws already that admirably covered the problem.

Thanks for clearing that up from pitch black to a very dark grey for me....lol
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Might, maybe, could be. Would be up to the CA I would presume.

The bill was initially intended to curb celebratory gun fire, but seems to have drifted into no man's land.

It's not like we didn't have enough gun laws already that admirably covered the problem.

That's why, with all gun laws (even one that says you cannot shoot a sleeping panda at the zoo) should be opposed.

If the legislature did not create an abortion out of it, a court surely would have anyways.

Some gun owners probably even supported the bill. Foolish foolish gun owners.
 
Last edited:
Top