Look, how can you not understand that coming on to a message board called "OpenCarry.org", extolling the advantages of CC over OC, and not backing up those assertions with any definitive proof is not going to sit well with the people here? Are you that dense?
For instance, you said that the tactical advantage of CC is that a bad guy doesn't know you're carrying. We pointed out that that would leave the bad guy thinking you are another unarmed victim, while OC shows the bad guy that you won't be a victim. You then claimed that it would give you the "element of surprise", apparently not thinking that if you have a gun in YOUR face it becomes tough to draw a concealed weapon without getting shot first. You never gave a response to that.
Or how about your assertion that you can draw from CC faster than from OC, which many of us KNOW is an absurd statement to make, yet you never backed up. Anytime you add a step to something - in this case, having to move an article of clothing out of the way to clear your draw - it is going to add time. AND the time added for that does not really compare to the time added disabling retention features. You have yet to counter that in any meaningful way other than "uh-huh", which isn't exactly proof.
This is the problem we have: you crap on OC in favor of CC, but nothing you have brought up really proves that it's better. You just keep yelling louder and getting more defensive, which may work for a 5 year old to win an argument, but not against intelligent adults. When you can manage that, then maybe we can take you a little more seriously.
