• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Is this an open carry encounter or a photography encounter?

RogueReflections

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
125
Location
Tacoma, Washington, United States
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65OB4I8qg_I


On 22 MAR 2014, at approximately 1410 hours, I was attempting to get footage of low flying planes, from public view, by Seattle International Airport. Also interested in some stock footage, I meandered down International Boulevard. About 3 minutes into this outing, I noticed a Port of Seattle Police (PSP) vehicle drive past me and initiate a U-turn. When the vehicle stopped at the light nearest me, to initiate another U-turn, I was pretty sure of police contact. I started rolling video.

In this encounter, I was free to go and never detained, as PSP Officer J. Mau clearly stated. I consented to remain and have a limited dialogue. At some point, another PSP officer appeared from my left side. I did not notice him at first and I neglected to get his name. These officers were a fine representation for their department.

What I find compelling about this particular video is: it shows what I have been saying since I decided to start filming all encounters...I will have more police contact for my camera than I ever will from open carrying my firearm (In this video, a model 23 Glock.)

On a side note, I was uncharacteristically nervous and extremely shaky during this interaction. It had nothing to to with the PSP Officers, because they seemed pretty down to earth. I realized afterwards that I skipped breakfast and only had coffee during the day. (NOTE TO SELF: eat before I cop-watch.)

This is my worst performance in an encounter, thus far. We live and we learn. LOL

- Rogue Reflections -
 

Grim_Night

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
776
Location
Pierce County, Washington
As "good" as that encounter went, I still call BS that they even bothered to stop you, let alone ask you for your name or ID. There was no reason what so ever for them to even stop you.
 

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
Of course it's BS, but ....
legally it wasn't a "stop" as no one was officially detained and legally they have as much right to engage in conversation as anyone else does. Admittedly, the guns and badges do make them more bold than the guy who just wants to sell ice cream, but we really shouldn't be prejudicial against someone merely by virtue of what they are wearing on their belts lest we be judged the same ourselves. In any case, the OP retained the right and authority to terminate the conversation on his own.

I do wonder though, how long the officers would have wanted to continue the voluntary encounter had the OP exerted his authority by setting conditions for it to continue.

>Rogue... definitely take a Zanax :p
 
Last edited:

BB62

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
4,069
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
As "good" as that encounter went, I still call BS that they even bothered to stop you, let alone ask you for your name or ID. There was no reason what so ever for them to even stop you.
Don't mischaracterize. Where do you see a "stop"??

The officer made it clear that RR was free to go after RR asked the question - which I believe was the second thing RR said.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
We do not know if the cop(s) would have "unlawfully stopped" the OP or not in the recording.

The OP allow himself to be engaged by the cop(s). Based on the OP's stated goals, we may never know if the OP will ever be unlawfully stopped for lawful behavior.
 

RogueReflections

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
125
Location
Tacoma, Washington, United States
>Rogue... definitely take a Zanax :p

While a Xanax would probably be good, I think a simple breakfast would have been better. I noticed the same thing in Auburn. No food, a lot of coffee, and encounters like this (even the calm ones) make for an over-excited time. I almost felt like I was on crack or something.
Just as I post positive and negative videos with police, I will post a positive or negative video about me, if there is a story to tell.

- Rogue Reflections -
 

RogueReflections

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
125
Location
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Excellent thought!

[The OP allow himself to be engaged by the cop(s). Based on the OP's stated goals, we may never know if the OP will ever be unlawfully stopped for lawful behavior.[/QUOTE]

Indeed. I agree with you. While sincerely trying to document encounters, maybe I am not doing what I should to set boundaries.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Indeed. I agree with you. While sincerely trying to document encounters, maybe I am not doing what I should to set boundaries.
I'm not requesting that you set boundaries.

There is a famous quote here on OCDO, famous to me anyway, this esteemed member may correct me if he chooses.

"Excuse me officer, I know you have a job to do but I do not consent to this encounter."

Boundaries currently exist. I am requesting that you "encourage" cops to observe their boundaries. It does not matter whether that cop "contacted" you for filming, or for your OC'd firearm, he made contact because of your lawful behavior.

I firmly believe that cops being seen, by our fellow citizens, driving by a visibly armed citizen is the best example as to the normalcy of OC and that armed citizens are not considered a threat to anyone.

The down side - you may have little to record other than a cop driving by.
 

RogueReflections

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
125
Location
Tacoma, Washington, United States
AH!

[Boundaries currently exist. I am requesting that you "encourage" cops to observe their boundaries. It does not matter whether that cop "contacted" you for filming, or for your OC'd firearm, he made contact because of your lawful behavior.

I firmly believe that cops being seen, by our fellow citizens, driving by a visibly armed citizen is the best example as to the normalcy of OC and that armed citizens are not considered a threat to anyone.

The down side - you may have little to record other than a cop driving by.[/QUOTE]

Insightful. Thank you for that input. This is one reason I love posting these encounters...the feedback.

- Rogue Reflections -
 
Top