• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

DUI checkpoints are cash cows for cities and their crony businessnes

Yard Sale

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
708
Location
Northern Nevada, ,
I was under the impression that they had requirements (a mention of requirements is made [strike]below[/strike]above) such as to essentially offer a way to turn away from the checkpoint and avoid it - this was the only way for it to be "constitutional"

I could be mistaken

In California, yes, and the guidelines are laid out in the decision Ingersoll v. Palmer. In Nevada, no.

But, if I'm not mistaken, I'm not surprised to hear that many police are in violation of the court-mandated requirements either ignorantly or intentionally.
In my case the cop who organizes the grant funding testified he set up the roadblock properly, without specifics. Then I got the cop car dash cam video which shows the roadblock wasn't set up legally. In the retrial, the same cop again testified he set up the roadblock properly, despite video evidence to contrary.
 
Top