Oh, sweet and fuzzy $diety on a pogo stick!
the case considered a 2008 California incident in which an anonymous 911 caller told the police that a pickup truck had forced her off the road, providing the location, as well as details such as the truck’s make, model, and license plate number. Police soon stopped a vehicle matching the description and reported smelling the odor of marijuana as they approached driver Jose Prado Navarette.
In other words, the tip had what SCOTUS calls "sufficient indica" of the who, what, where, and when so that the cops do not rush out looking for every blue pickup truck so they can [strike]shoot it up[/strike] stop and search it just for giggles.
I am going to ignore the "odor of marijuana" issue - it needs its own symposium in order to be hashed out.
Getting back on track - SCOTUS has always held that tips need to be considered based on points of reliability. One of their favorites was the track record of the tipster. The only thing the case seems to do is say that based on a whole lot of other specific information the identity and track record of the tipster need not be absolute controlling considerations.
You guys owe me three aspirins and the five minutes of my life I had to expend due to your "The Sky Is Falling!!111Eleventy!!" hysteria.
stay safe.