Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: CT LEOs refuse to enforce new laws

  1. #1
    Activist Member JamesCanby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Alexandria, VA at www.NoVA-MDSelfDefense.com
    Posts
    1,543

    CT LEOs refuse to enforce new laws

    http://www.americasfreedomfighters.c...-control-laws/

    FUQ:“Tyler Jackson has emailed me an interesting story, soon to appear online (I’ll link to it once it does)– the gist is that the head of the Connecticut Peace Officers’ Assn has released an open letter stating that the police will not “be party to the oppression of the people of the state by enforcing an unconstitutional law.” So far 250 LEOs have cosigned the letter.”

    There is some indication that this may have been a fabrication, a hoax.
    Last edited by JamesCanby; 05-19-2014 at 01:14 PM.
    Air Force Veteran
    NRA Life Member
    VCDL Member
    NRA Certified Chief Range Safety Officer
    NRA Certified Instructor: Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Home Firearm Safety, Personal Protection
    Maryland Qualified Handgun Instructor
    Certified Instructor, Associated Gun Clubs of Baltimore, Inc.
    Member, Mt. Washington Rod & Gun Club
    National Sporting Clays Association Certified Referee

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Posts
    13,153

    Some Connecticut police refusing to enforce AW law POSSIBLE HOAX

    Some Connecticut police refusing to enforce AW law
    Posted by David Hardy · 7 March 2014 07:55 PM

    [UPDATE: several commentors have noted they cannot find any Connecticut Peace Officers Association online... nor can I. I've emailed the person who emailed me on this, asking for info. His indication had been that the article (which he attached) would be online in a few days at http://ezinearticles.com/. Until he responds, or does not respond, I'd treat this as a possible hoax. I would have done more digging except that when I posted I was on a plane, as part of 4,000-miles-in-36-hours trip.]

    [FURTHER UPDATE: Actually, update to an update. I was absolutely sure this was a hoax and there was no story, when the story appeared online. I'd checked with ezinearticles.com, and they'd said the author was not enrolled to post there -- I guess they were wrong. Now, this doesn't cure the problem that the CPOA can't be found, but at least there is a story.]

    [UPDATED UPDATE: one of the commentors, down toward the very end, notes there is a Wikipedia article on the CPOA ... but it was created this afternoon, by the author of the article. Yep, the article may be real but it's a hoax.]
    http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/20...connecticu.php
    I am responsible for my writing, not your understanding of it.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,929
    Hmm.

    Who would benefit from duping the citizenry with such a story?


  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesCanby View Post
    http://www.americasfreedomfighters.c...-control-laws/

    FUQ:“Tyler Jackson has emailed me an interesting story, soon to appear online (I’ll link to it once it does)– the gist is that the head of the Connecticut Peace Officers’ Assn has released an open letter stating that the police will not “be party to the oppression of the people of the state by enforcing an unconstitutional law.” So far 250 LEOs have cosigned the letter.”

    There is some indication that this may have been a fabrication, a hoax.
    And who is this association?

    FUQ is FU-FUQ lol

  5. #5
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338
    The Sheriffs play a similar game in this state were there is two different associations and they will claim to form opposing opinions. Yet when we dug into it we find they are headed by the same folks and located in the same office.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •