davidmcbeth
Banned
http://www.ct.gov/foi/lib/foi/hor_2014/ho_05282014/2013_420.pdf
And DESPP's sign in/ID station? Not OK when doing records request ..
See FIC2009-547 .. requiring ID is a no no
Ed does a nice service here and he is completely correct ... DESPP simply does not care about complying with the Act and the FIC doesn't either
I am trying to eliminate the FIC and replace it with a CA-style appeal process ~ then if they don't comply, you get $$ in your pocket. The FIC has, since my petitioning for this, decided not to hear any of my cases. But my case before NB will fix this BS.
And a second case before the commission, likely the incident that Ed wrote about before months ago..
http://www.ct.gov/foi/lib/foi/hor_2014/ho_05282014/2013_463.pdf
The requirement to "make an appointment" is garbage. Ed was correct although not handled "gentlemanly" who cares ~ its DESPP ~ avoiders of providing public records
I have no pity for any DESPP employee ...
And DESPP's sign in/ID station? Not OK when doing records request ..
See FIC2009-547 .. requiring ID is a no no
Ed does a nice service here and he is completely correct ... DESPP simply does not care about complying with the Act and the FIC doesn't either
I am trying to eliminate the FIC and replace it with a CA-style appeal process ~ then if they don't comply, you get $$ in your pocket. The FIC has, since my petitioning for this, decided not to hear any of my cases. But my case before NB will fix this BS.
And a second case before the commission, likely the incident that Ed wrote about before months ago..
http://www.ct.gov/foi/lib/foi/hor_2014/ho_05282014/2013_463.pdf
The requirement to "make an appointment" is garbage. Ed was correct although not handled "gentlemanly" who cares ~ its DESPP ~ avoiders of providing public records
I have no pity for any DESPP employee ...
Last edited: