See nothing here to substantiate that a drone was in use - nada.
See nothing here to substantiate that a drone was in use - nada.
Oh, you weren't sarcastic. :uhoh:No buildings 65' tall?
Helicopter?
What is the confirmed indication that a drone was in use? Did the LEA admit to such use or FOIA substantiate it? If so show us.
Cutting and pasting low level and higher level shots together does not in and of itself substantiate the use of a drone.
Indubitably not.Oh, you weren't sarcastic. :uhoh:
The drone is clearly visible in the video and easily identified from the drone footage. It is very obviously a quadricopter drone fitted with an HD cam that belongs to Onus, or someone working with him. Not the cops.
You can see the pilot in the video at the 9 second mark. You can see the quadricopter in the sky shortly after that. If you watch it, it spins around. As you watch the footage from the quadricopter, you can see it move in patterns not see with full sized helicopters.Indubitably not.
I still see no drone. I do see an opening pan up footage.
If user onus has such a beastie, show us the bird with a known/recognized, trusted user in the same picture. Then we'll discuss the legitimacy of any footage gained.
I'm not entirely w/o knowledge of such genuine birds as a close acquaintance in Virginia has flown his complete w/HD camera.
Indubitably not.
I still see no drone. I do see an opening pan up footage.
If user onus has such a beastie, show us the bird with a known/recognized, trusted user in the same picture. Then we'll discuss the legitimacy of any footage gained.
I'm not entirely w/o knowledge of such genuine birds as a close acquaintance in Virginia has flown his complete w/HD camera.
You can see the pilot in the video at the 9 second mark. You can see the quadricopter in the sky shortly after that. If you watch it, it spins around. As you watch the footage from the quadricopter, you can see it move in patterns not see with full sized helicopters.
So which do you think more likely, that Onus had a full sized manned helicopter at the scene flying in patterns that would require an ace pilot and is entirely abnormal to make people think he, or someone he knows, owns a drone, all for reasons I can't even begin to speculate on. Or maybe, just maybe, he or someone he knows actually does have a quadricopter?
Call me gullible if you want, but as far as I'm concerned, this is sufficient evidence that Onus, or someone he knows, actually has a quadricopter. :lol:
No, but I can see why you would think it might be.Off topic - is that a unicycle behind him.
From $60.00 to $700.00 - something in every price range.Love the section where the LEO at one of the stop points is flashing his light up into the "quad".
I'm still amazed at just how stable those things are.
Those shots are NOT from a helicopter.
Every time I see those things workout like that, I get closer to convincing myself that I need to buy one now.
AD
Sent from the Glock Range Bag iPad using Tapatalk and a screwdriver
Isn't it illegal to shine a light at an aircraft?
Indubitably not.
I still see no drone. I do see an opening pan up footage.
If user onus has such a beastie, show us the bird with a known/recognized, trusted user in the same picture. Then we'll discuss the legitimacy of any footage gained.
I'm not entirely w/o knowledge of such genuine birds as a close acquaintance in Virginia has flown his complete w/HD camera.
Love the section where the LEO at one of the stop points is flashing his light up into the "quad".
I'm still amazed at just how stable those things are.
Those shots are NOT from a helicopter.
Every time I see those things workout like that, I get closer to convincing myself that I need to buy one now.
AD
Sent from the Glock Range Bag iPad using Tapatalk and a screwdriver
Nice, thanks!
FWIW, it's not the first-ever drone footage of a roadblock. Maybe not the first in California, even. There was one posted on YouTube, but I can't find it; it may have been taken down.