Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 81

Thread: Some Schools will have armed officials in Yakima County

  1. #1
    Opt-Out Members BigDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yakima, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,463

    Some Schools will have armed officials in Yakima County

    Finally the beginning of arming some school administrators to be first responders.

    http://www.yakimaherald.com/home/222...ials-this-fall

    Fireworks are sure to come out of this announcement.
    • Being prepared is to prepare, this is our responsibility.
    • I am not your Mommy or Daddy and do not sugar coat it but I will tell you simply as how I see it, it is up to you on how you will or will not use it.
    • IANAL, all information I present is for your review, do your own homework.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Posts
    13,161
    Yep. Particularly for being labeled as first responders.

    I've a local cop, hired as a cop, that has become a first responder too, EMS crew leader, that I do not trust with exigent circumstances to intrude on my curtilage.

    I also know an otherwise waste of skin that has been certified CERT.

    This is authoritariansim and credentialism run amok.
    I am responsible for my writing, not your understanding of it.

  3. #3
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare View Post
    Yep. Particularly for being labeled as first responders.

    I've a local cop, hired as a cop, that has become a first responder too, EMS crew leader, that I do not trust with exigent circumstances to intrude on my curtilage.

    I also know an otherwise waste of skin that has been certified CERT.

    This is authoritariansim and credentialism run amok.
    +1
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  4. #4
    Regular Member OC Freedom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    ADA County, ID
    Posts
    605
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare View Post
    Yep. Particularly for being labeled as first responders.

    I've a local cop, hired as a cop, that has become a first responder too, EMS crew leader, that I do not trust with exigent circumstances to intrude on my curtilage.

    I also know an otherwise waste of skin that has been certified CERT.

    This is authoritariansim and credentialism run amok.
    +2

  5. #5
    Regular Member Dave_pro2a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    2,227
    Ahhh, the perks of being upper management.
    Last edited by Dave_pro2a; 06-08-2014 at 01:49 PM.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_pro2a View Post
    Ahhh, the perks of being upper management.
    They'll end up shooting themselves in the head ... so all-in-all, its a good law.

  7. #7
    Regular Member Dave_pro2a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    2,227
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    They'll end up shooting themselves in the head ... so all-in-all, its a good law.
    Bah, we'll be lucky if they only shoot their own foot.

    Militarization of LEOs, and now 'Policeization' of teachers. Our .gov is really starting to get 'proactive.'

    Letting Taliban out of Gitmo, but don't worry, your kids are now under lock, key and gun..
    Last edited by Dave_pro2a; 06-08-2014 at 03:41 PM.

  8. #8
    Opt-Out Members BigDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Yakima, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,463
    Comparisons of how most law enforcement view the common man for carrying and the ones who carry view others moving ahead to defend our children, hypocritical! I think so.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    • Being prepared is to prepare, this is our responsibility.
    • I am not your Mommy or Daddy and do not sugar coat it but I will tell you simply as how I see it, it is up to you on how you will or will not use it.
    • IANAL, all information I present is for your review, do your own homework.

  9. #9
    Regular Member Difdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    996
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    They'll end up shooting themselves in the head ... so all-in-all, its a good law.
    I'm not so worried about them shooting themselves in the head...I'm worried about where all the missed shots will go until they finally manage to hit their target.

  10. #10
    Regular Member Primus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_pro2a View Post
    Ahhh, the perks of being upper management.
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    They'll end up shooting themselves in the head ... so all-in-all, its a good law.
    Quote Originally Posted by BigDave View Post
    Comparisons of how most law enforcement view the common man for carrying and the ones who carry view others moving ahead to defend our children, hypocritical! I think so.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by Difdi View Post
    I'm not so worried about them shooting themselves in the head...I'm worried about where all the missed shots will go until they finally manage to hit their target.
    I'm confused. So all of you guys are against teachers carrying guns to protect kids?

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    "The wicked flee when no man persueth: but the righteous are as bold as a lion" Proverbs 28:1

  11. #11
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pleasant Grove, Utah, USA
    Posts
    3,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Primus View Post
    I'm confused. So all of you guys are against teachers carrying guns to protect kids?

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    Not me, I'm against the "state" allowing only a specific class of persons to exercise self defense or defense of children. Teachers, parents, custodians, school bus drivers, or any other person ought to have the unfetered right to defend themselves and others if and when needed no matter where they are legally present without having to wait for those in a uniform with a shiny badge to get there!
    RIGHTS don't exist without RESPONSIBILITY!
    If one is not willing to stand for his rights, he doesn't have any Rights.
    I will strive to stand for the rights of ANY person, even those folks with whom I disagree!
    As said by SVG--- "I am not anti-COP, I am PRO-Citizen" and I'll add, PRO-Constitution.
    If the above makes me a RADICAL or EXTREME--- So be it!

    Life Member NRA
    Life Member GOA
    2nd amendment says.... "...The right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"

  12. #12
    Regular Member Dave_pro2a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    2,227
    Quote Originally Posted by Primus View Post
    I'm confused. So all of you guys are against teachers carrying guns to protect kids?

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    Special Rights for thee, none for me.

    Some pigs are more equal than others.

  13. #13
    Regular Member Ajetpilot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Olalla, Kitsap County, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,410
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeSparky View Post
    Not me, I'm against the "state" allowing only a specific class of persons to exercise self defense or defense of children. Teachers, parents, custodians, school bus drivers, or any other person ought to have the unfetered right to defend themselves and others if and when needed no matter where they are legally present without having to wait for those in a uniform with a shiny badge to get there!
    +1

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Primus View Post
    I'm confused. So all of you guys are against teachers carrying guns to protect kids?

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    I would support anyone's right to carry almost anywhere at anytime... but why are they special? Can you now carry there?

  15. #15
    Regular Member Primus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,216
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    I would support anyone's right to carry almost anywhere at anytime... but why are they special? Can you now carry there?
    I wouldn't say they are special in anyway. It sounds like they are going to train and arm their employees. Key word train. I could be wrong though.



    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    "The wicked flee when no man persueth: but the righteous are as bold as a lion" Proverbs 28:1

  16. #16
    Regular Member Primus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_pro2a View Post
    Special Rights for thee, none for me.

    Some pigs are more equal than others.
    Who are the pigs you are referring to?

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Primus; 06-08-2014 at 09:51 PM.
    "The wicked flee when no man persueth: but the righteous are as bold as a lion" Proverbs 28:1

  17. #17
    Regular Member Dave_pro2a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    2,227
    Quote Originally Posted by Primus View Post
    Who are the pigs you are referring to?

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    Was this put on some sort of 'do not read' list for highschools?


  18. #18
    Regular Member Primus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_pro2a View Post
    Was this put on some sort of 'do not read' list for highschools?

    Not sure if it was on a list, but I can say thats the first I have heard of the book. Actually had to Google it and see what it was.

    Also, I can say thank you for mentioning it. I just downloaded it to my kindle for reading.

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    "The wicked flee when no man persueth: but the righteous are as bold as a lion" Proverbs 28:1

  19. #19
    Regular Member Dave_pro2a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    2,227
    Quote Originally Posted by Primus View Post
    Not sure if it was on a list, but I can say thats the first I have heard of the book. Actually had to Google it and see what it was.

    Also, I can say thank you for mentioning it. I just downloaded it to my kindle for reading.

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    I've never read Catcher in the Rye, but I've still heard of it.

  20. #20
    Regular Member Primus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    4,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave_pro2a View Post
    I've never read Catcher in the Rye, but I've still heard of it.
    Ok congratulations on that. So have I.

    I'm certain there are numerous books that both you and I have heard of and not read.

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
    "The wicked flee when no man persueth: but the righteous are as bold as a lion" Proverbs 28:1

  21. #21
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Posts
    13,161

    George Orwell books. If you haven't read them or got them, then get them in print.

    Animal Farm http://www.gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100011.txt

    George Orwell books are being/have been disappeared. AmaXon's treatment of Animal Farm (and ironically Nineteen Eighty-Four) in 2009 may have been the first battle in the Digital Restrictions Management war.

    See http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/te.../18amazon.html

    Who was and was not caused to read George Orwell and J. D. Salinger in secondary school may be the cusp between compliant citizens enforcers and the recalcitrant dissident citizens.

    I wonder what other critical literature and thought was not introduced to the compliant ones.
    I am responsible for my writing, not your understanding of it.

  22. #22
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeSparky View Post
    Not me, I'm against the "state" allowing only a specific class of persons to exercise self defense or defense of children. Teachers, parents, custodians, school bus drivers, or any other person ought to have the unfetered right to defend themselves and others if and when needed no matter where they are legally present without having to wait for those in a uniform with a shiny badge to get there!
    +1
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  23. #23
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338
    Quote Originally Posted by BigDave View Post
    Comparisons of how most law enforcement view the common man for carrying and the ones who carry view others moving ahead to defend our children, hypocritical! I think so.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


    Always conflating government with private individuals.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  24. #24
    Regular Member Difdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    996
    Quote Originally Posted by sudden valley gunner View Post
    Always conflating government with private individuals.
    When one 'private individual' can make a decision that affects another private individual or that other individual's children, then that is government.

  25. #25
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Difdi View Post
    When one 'private individual' can make a decision that affects another private individual or that other individual's children, then that is government.
    I can fire someone who works for me that affects them and may affect their children. I can be fired from a job or have my guys quit which would affect me and my children, neither one of us would be government.

    The essence Governement or the state is the involuntary violence.


    And its not hypocritical to make judgement upon constitutionally restricted state agents and what they should or should not carry. Comparing that to private citizens.....is silly.
    Last edited by sudden valley gunner; 06-09-2014 at 09:29 PM.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •