• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

I could use some background on a 2012 OC incident, please

BB62

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
4,069
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
http://www.annarbor.com/news/crime/unarmed-man-attempts-to-rob-emu-student-carrying-holstered-gun/

Any background would be greatly appreciated.


The above described incident was one of two cited by the author, a current firearms and defensive training officer for a PD, as reasons he "contemplated" OCing. It's clear that he came to the conclusion that OC is bad!

Here's a link to Buckeye Firearms Association's Facebook post which links to the article and cites the incident: https://www.facebook.com/BuckeyeFirearmsAssociation/posts/10152454945775090?fref=nf

And a link to the article on BFA's website: http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/perils-open-carry
 
Last edited:

xmanhockey7

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
1,195
Remember reading about it, but didn't hear anything more about it other than maybe a thread here. That's about all the info as far as I know.
 

PeterNSteinmetz

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
177
Location
Tempe, Arizona
I like how the author at BuckeyeFirearms cites the first article, but neglects to mention the parts of the article that note this must be a very unusual occurrence. Basically this is a question of the odds of the gun being taken by a criminal versus its deterrent effect. The extreme rarity of civilian OC'ers having their gun taken suggest deterrence may be the more likely outcome.
 

Maverick9

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
1,404
Location
Mid-atlantic
What I don't understand with these 'OC-ers' are the first to get shot posters is they're not really analyzing their postulate or scenario.

It's like saying in war, soldiers get shot first. In fact more civilians get killed than soldiers in a lot of wars.

In order for an OC-er to be shot -because- of his firearm you have to have:
1. Proximity
2. Unobstructed access (good shot)
3. Visibility (night, day, weather, contrasting clothing and holster/gun)
4. Opportunity
5. Focus (most BGs focus on their crime in progress)
6. Time and distance
...and a few more things.

We all know that a large percentage of people don't look at your waist or hip. In fact one guy said that people who do notice OCer in well-lighted stores are kids and people driving motorized shopping carts. They are at eye-level to your waist (and a grocery store is lit up to the max).

So while a BG might 'see' a gun, if the person is walking and a crowd of people are between them, he might lose sight. If he has a good shot, but it's dark or raining, then he can't draw a bead.

You almost have to have perfect conditions, the BG walks up to someone, sees the gun, has his gun in hand the OC-er is standing still (since, unlike cops we are not rushing to engage).

(Whew)

IOW they're mostly retards with a hidden agenda who say that.
 
Last edited:
Top