• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Obamacare dead? WA fed appellate court ruling

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/22/obamacare-dealt-serious-setback/


Millions of Americans are not entitled to government health insurance subsidies under Obamacare because of the way the law is written, a divided three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/22/obamacare-dealt-serious-setback/#ixzz38DCxDDk0
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter



I guess congressmen should have read it before they passed it ! Suckers!

When I find link to actual opinion, I'll post
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/...ing-gutted_n_5609795.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

Check the UPDATE about 3/4 of the way down the page.

The 4th Circuit just said it's good to go.

I suppose at some time it will head to SCOTUS who will have rule on this through the tax code.

stay safe.

What what I have read the law specifically limits subsidies to only those states' residents from states that set up their own exchanges.

When the law is plain and understandable, any extratextual crap of what they meant to do is irrelevant ~ the law is clear enough.

I don't see this passing muster in any court...any court that ruled otherwise are infants
 

falcon1

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
124
Location
, Tennessee, USA
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/...ing-gutted_n_5609795.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

Check the UPDATE about 3/4 of the way down the page.

The 4th Circuit just said it's good to go.

I suppose at some time it will head to SCOTUS who will have rule on this through the tax code.

stay safe.

The Administration will ask for an en banc hearing by the DC Appellate Court for the Federal Circuit. If the entire court rules like the Fourth Circuit just did, it may or may not be granted certiorari by SCOTUS. If the entire court for the federal circuit rules as the panel did, then SCOTUS won't have much choice but to take it.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/10125254D91F8BAC85257D1D004E6176/$file/14-5018-1503850.pdf

for the opinion^^
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
This situation arose after Senator Harry Reid, acting as the Majority Leader in the Senate, changed the rules about how the Senate approves Presidential nominees. Result: Obama recently appointed four judges, only one of which would have passed muster under the old rules.

Furthermore, the court slated to review this first is staffed with a judge recently appointed under the new rules. Put simply, by stacking the judiciary with judges patently favoring Obama's regime, Obama and his cronies are stacking the deck against a fair and impartial judiciary.
 
Top