Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Video: Charges Against Doctor with AR in Airport were False

  1. #1
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Yuma, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    923

    Video: Charges Against Doctor with AR in Airport were False

    I found copies of the video, and a statement by an unnamed witness that there never was a "muzzle sweep". it appears that the police interviewed the two women five seconds after the Doctor unslung the rifle. I never saw the muzzle move more than 20 degrees off of vertical.

    The videos, which include prominent TV anchor Mark Curtis saying that it would be reasonable for any Arizonan to "blow away" anyone who came into a Starbucks with a rifle over his shoulder, are at the article.

    http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/08...t-phoenix.html

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East Valley
    Posts
    126

    Mark Curtis

    I can now say I dislike Mark Curtis, the guy is an idiot thinking that just because someone walks around with a gun they deserve to get "blown away".

  3. #3
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,620
    Quote Originally Posted by ccwinstructor View Post
    I found copies of the video, and a statement by an unnamed witness that there never was a "muzzle sweep". it appears that the police interviewed the two women five seconds after the Doctor unslung the rifle. I never saw the muzzle move more than 20 degrees off of vertical.

    The videos, which include prominent TV anchor Mark Curtis saying that it would be reasonable for any Arizonan to "blow away" anyone who came into a Starbucks with a rifle over his shoulder, are at the article.

    http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/08...t-phoenix.html
    Dr. Steinmetz was involved in strong, political speech with his protest, protected by both the first and second amendments. The fact that he was arrested, charged, was suspended from his job, his name smeared across the nation and internationally, with what appear to be false accusations, seems calculated to engender a chilling effect on the exercise of first and second amendment rights.
    http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/08...t-phoenix.html

    Can you say "Ka-ching"?

    My crystal ball sees a substantial windfall in the doctor's future.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 08-05-2014 at 10:53 PM.
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East Valley
    Posts
    126

    Against who?

    Quote Originally Posted by Grapeshot View Post

    Can you say "Ka-ching"?

    My crystal ball sees a substantial windfall in the doctor's future.
    This might sound like a stupid question to ask but who necessarily would the lawsuit be against?

  5. #5
    Regular Member DocWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Mountain Home, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Javelina View Post
    This might sound like a stupid question to ask but who necessarily would the lawsuit be against?
    Starbucks, the airprot, the cops, and anyone else involed. Bring everyone of these liers to the party.

  6. #6
    Regular Member Kopis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    727
    Typically, anyone/company involved would be a named defendant including the lady who reported him. She could be on the hook personally but starbucks and the airport authority have the deep pockets.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    East Valley
    Posts
    126
    I couldn't see Starbucks since it seems like they have nothing really to do with it (i.e. calling the police or claiming to be a "victim") however I could possibly see something with the police or Sky Harbor, only time will tell.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Rusty Young Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Árida Zona
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by Javelina View Post
    I couldn't see Starbucks since it seems like they have nothing really to do with it (i.e. calling the police or claiming to be a "victim") however I could possibly see something with the police or Sky Harbor, only time will tell.
    And the two females, if they are the ones on the left side of the video. This is about teaching so-called "public servants" to obey the law and respect the Rights of the individual (as well as not throwing their weight around to enforce their opinions), teaching people that not to bear false witness (especially when it causes an innocent the deprivation of his Freedom), not about the money.
    The money just seems to be the only effective way to have people remember for the next time.
    I carry to defend my loved ones; Desensitizing and educating are secondary & tertiary reasons. Anything else is unintended.

    “Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” - Frederic Bastiat

    "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." - Edmund Burke

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •