• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

NRA commentator claims blind people should be allowed to buy and use guns because...

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
There may be some .... misconceptions... in how we 'see' blindness.


The United States Congress says that if a person still sees 20/200 vision, or worse, after glasses and/or contacts, then they are legally blind. It also states that if someone has only 20 degrees of peripheral vision, or less, they are also considered legally blind.

So what does the world look like to someone legally blind?
river_orig_1.jpg

river_20_200.jpg

river_20_400.jpg


As you can see, someone who is barely legally blind, as depicted above, is not even close to being totally blind.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Nothing wrong with 1000% blind people from owning and possessing guns.

Sorry antis, they have the same rights everyone else does.
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
Nothing wrong with 1000% blind people from owning and possessing guns.

Sorry antis, they have the same rights everyone else does.

Quick! Somebody look out the window. I agree wioth davidmcbeth.:uhoh:

Actually, it really is a no-brainer. The ability to exercise an individual right is not dependent on the absence of a physical disability. The privilege of driving an automobile may be limited by the state. Two completely different issues.

stay safe.
 

MAC702

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
6,331
Location
Nevada
"Blind" people have to decide at the moment for the circumstances whether they are justified in firing, just like we do.
 

Rusty Young Man

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
1,548
Location
Árida Zona
"Blind" people have to decide at the moment for the circumstances whether they are justified in firing, just like we do.

It seems these antis are the "foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not"; should a frail old woman be denied self protection because she "might be unable to handle the recoil"? Should a disable man be denied because he "may have the gun taken and used against him?

The antis generally seem to call themselves "progressive" and espouse the equality of all, regardless of disability, but it is because of things like this that anyone open to reason can see they're hypocrites when it comes down to practicing what they preach.
 

Saxxon

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
222
Location
Northglenn, Colorado
In truth the restrictions on short barreled shot guns is discriminatory against blind people, because to defend themselves if totally blind they will be firing toward sound, and the extra spread increases their chance of a hit and succseful defense. The way it is now they are unlikely to go thru the hassle to get one, but its most suited to their situation and needs, in the home certainly. Outside the home a single projectile weapon would still be preferable to avoid stray shots, its likely they would want something they can fire at close range if accosted.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
In truth the restrictions on short barreled shot guns is discriminatory against blind people, because to defend themselves if totally blind they will be firing toward sound, and the extra spread increases their chance of a hit and succseful defense. The way it is now they are unlikely to go thru the hassle to get one, but its most suited to their situation and needs, in the home certainly. Outside the home a single projectile weapon would still be preferable to avoid stray shots, its likely they would want something they can fire at close range if accosted.
The pattern isn't exactly as some people might imagine.

http://410handguns.com/410fist_test.html
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
It seems these antis are the "foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not"; should a frail old woman be denied self protection because she "might be unable to handle the recoil"? Should a disable man be denied because he "may have the gun taken and used against him?

The antis generally seem to call themselves "progressive" and espouse the equality of all, regardless of disability, but it is because of things like this that anyone open to reason can see they're hypocrites when it comes down to practicing what they preach.

Heck they allow people with no brain function to vote (ie democrats), right?
 

WalkingWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
11,930
Location
North Carolina
Nothing wrong with 1000% blind people from owning and possessing guns.

Sorry antis, they have the same rights everyone else does.

Completely agree, being blind does not make a person a criminal or mean they will kill. In fact I have heard of no cases where blind people have committed violent crimes. I am sure there are some, but apparently they are very few.

The antis just want to make excuses to take rights away.
 

beebobby

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
847
Location
, ,
I guess blind folks will just have to skip the "identify your target" step in a shooting situation.
 
Top