Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Best Answer

  1. #1
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,438

    Best Answer

    "Because it's both legal and lawful for me to do so."

    Put them on the defensive for a change. Let the retards beat their heads about a light pole for a change, and if they fail, you've got $35 grand coming your way, if past cases are any clue.
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. OO-RAH!!! Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and other founding documents.

    As for President Trump, he's getting the job done.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172
    "you making a grab for my gun?!"

  3. #3
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,550
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    "Because it's both legal and lawful for me to do so."

    Put them on the defensive for a change. Let the retards beat their heads about a light pole for a change, and if they fail, you've got $35 grand coming your way, if past cases are any clue.
    That response would very much depend on in which state one were standing and in some cases which county or city.

    One size does not always fit all.
    Better to not open your mouth and be thought the fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  4. #4
    Regular Member stealthyeliminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,100
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    "Because it's both legal and lawful for me to do so."

    Put them on the defensive for a change. Let the retards beat their heads about a light pole for a change, and if they fail, you've got $35 grand coming your way, if past cases are any clue.
    Honestly just curious -- is saying that it is both legal and lawful not redundant? If not, what's the difference?
    Advocate freedom please

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legal
    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lawful

    engrish ... go figure .. slight difference between the two (I guess)
    Last edited by davidmcbeth; 08-16-2014 at 11:36 AM.

  6. #6
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    16,690
    Quote Originally Posted by stealthyeliminator View Post
    Honestly just curious -- is saying that it is both legal and lawful not redundant? If not, what's the difference?
    Depends on who's "Law".

    To us Natrual law folks positive law for positive law sake doesn't measure up to the standard of Law.

    So things legal because some magical authority figure(s) says it is so or because it when through the proper channels they allow to exist does not make it necessarily lawful and quite often is antithetical to true law.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •