Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: A correct ruling regarding frisking carriers who OC but better wording needed

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172

    A correct ruling regarding frisking carriers who OC but better wording needed

    There must also be reasonable suspicion that a crime might occur. Otherwise, law abiding armed citizens are always subject to a frisk without reasonable suspicion

    http://fourthamendment.com/?p=12915


    Second sentence needed?

  2. #2
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pleasant Grove, Utah, USA
    Posts
    3,624
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    There must also be reasonable suspicion that a crime might occur. Otherwise, law abiding armed citizens are always subject to a frisk without reasonable suspicion

    http://fourthamendment.com/?p=12915


    Second sentence needed?
    Let us just clarify.... "reasonable suspicion that a crime might occur" --- Any timeframe limits here or just ANYTIME since the Jurassic period or until the earth is utterly destroyed by a giant meteor?
    RIGHTS don't exist without RESPONSIBILITY!
    If one is not willing to stand for his rights, he doesn't have any Rights.
    I will strive to stand for the rights of ANY person, even those folks with whom I disagree!
    As said by SVG--- "I am not anti-COP, I am PRO-Citizen" and I'll add, PRO-Constitution.
    If the above makes me a RADICAL or EXTREME--- So be it!

    Life Member NRA
    Life Member GOA
    2nd amendment says.... "...The right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"

  3. #3
    Regular Member March Hare's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Arridzona - Flatlander
    Posts
    351

    Um...

    I'm confused, what is the reason for this thread?

    -MH
    $2 Bill - Calling Card of the 2A Movement
    If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything.
    Seriously, who is John Galt?
    Vires et honestas

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172
    Quote Originally Posted by March Hare View Post
    I'm confused, what is the reason for this thread?

    -MH
    Just a case stating RAS needed to harass carriers ... nothing important, right?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •