• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

A correct ruling regarding frisking carriers who OC but better wording needed

J

JoeSparky

Centurion
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,621
Location
Pleasant Grove, Utah, USA
davidmcbeth said:
There must also be reasonable suspicion that a crime might occur. Otherwise, law abiding armed citizens are always subject to a frisk without reasonable suspicion

http://fourthamendment.com/?p=12915


Second sentence needed?
Click to expand...

Let us just clarify.... "reasonable suspicion that a crime might occur" --- Any timeframe limits here or just ANYTIME since the Jurassic period or until the earth is utterly destroyed by a giant meteor?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top