Thread: Corporations not companies
This is a thread created so as to not derail another thread. I am going to do my best to not be part of thread derailments anymore.
You can have a corporation without having a company. The point of a corporation is to legalize theft through a protection of debt liability.
Corporations are not real on their own. They only exist with the say so of a state. A business can be exist without the state and without being a corporation. Many businesses are referred to as companies (I have not checked a legal definition of company as it relates to businesses). A business has one or a group of owners. A business cannot steal and get away with it like a corporation. I propose that business owners have rights so long as the owners are of flesh and blood. That those of flesh and blood can create conditions of entry etc etc and according to the principles of non-aggression you can freely choose to do business with someone or not.
I propose that corporations are state entities and often can gain government sponsored monopolies which would force you to do business with them for a unique service/product that you would not be able/allowed to self provide. I also propose that flesh and blood people have rights and that to secure these rights governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Given these two proposals, I would have to say that a corporation cannot have anymore authority to restrict your rights than they states have in the first place. Since the states were created to protect your rights then corporations would have to be responsible for your well being if it is decided to forbid tools of self defense (weapons) while visiting that they must be liable for any an all harm that may happen to you while visiting/working within the set limited boundaries.
In short if, for example, a mall is a unarmed victim zone and you while visiting get mugged, shot, etc and this could have been deterred by you being armed, then that corporation would have to pay you 2x (more maybe?) damages that you had suffered due to the policy being in place.
I am writing this in a hurry so I do not have all my thoughts straightened out but I wanted to share without derailing another thread.
Please keep the responses constructive.
Provision for free medical attendance and nursing, for clothing, for food, for housing, for the education of children, and a hundred other matters, might with equal propriety be proposed as tending to relieve the employee of mental strain and worry. --- These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of congressional power. (Railroad Retirement Board v Alton Railroad)