Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Oregon Open Carry Holster...

  1. #1
    Regular Member Fallschirmjäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Georgia, USA

    Oregon Open Carry Holster...

    Earlier this afternoon, I was reliably informed by someone "who knows what they're talking about" that the only way to "openly carry in Oregon without a permit was to carry the pistol in a hip holster and it's not covered by a jacket, shirt etc. That's the only form of carry that is legal without a permit. Shoulder rigs, etc are a no-go. "
    The 'not covered by jacket or shirt is understandable, being covered is being concealed but....

    Is this what the Oregon code says, or is someone reading something into the law that's not there?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Jefferson County, CO
    It looks like the relevant wording is here:

    166.250. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section or ORS 166.260, 166.270, 166.274, 166.291, 166.292 or 166.410 to 166.470, a person commits the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm if the person knowingly:
    (3) Firearms carried openly in belt holsters are not concealed within the meaning of this section.
    From what I read, it doesn't say that "only" belt holsters are allowed. Just that a belt-holstered weapon shall not be considered "concealed". I believe this is to reflect an idea somebody brought up in another thread this morning - that since a proper holster covers a good portion of the gun, and many jurisdictions don't allow concealment of any portion of the gun, this clause simple excludes the holster as "concealment". That way, you can openly carry with an obvious holster, but not be prosecuted just because it partially covers the gun.

    It seems excessive wording to me, but you know there had to be some reason to include it that way. After all, they had to put a warning on clothing irons to NOT iron clothes while wearing them.

    EDIT: that I think about it, he may be right. The wording specifically says "belt" holsters. You know - I think a 2A-friendly lawyer in Oregon is your best bet to find the correct interpretation.
    Last edited by jackrockblc; 09-20-2014 at 10:35 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts