• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Successful as applied challenge to GCA "felon in possession" law!

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...on-from-federal-ban-on-felons-possessing-guns

Decision: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...content/uploads/sites/14/2014/09/binderup.pdf

Summary:

Contrary to popular assumptions, a felony conviction is not required to lose your gun rights under federal law. So the term "felon in possession" is commonly used to refer to persons who have in actuality only been convicted only of misdemeanors, and often non-violent misdemeanors at that. One of these folks just one a court case challenging this law.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 as amended strips gun rights from anyone convicted of a “crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year” [but this does not] does not include—

(A) any Federal or State offenses pertaining to antitrust violations, unfair trade practices, restraints of trade, or other similar offenses relating to the regulation of business practices, or

(B) any State offense classified by the laws of the State as a misdemeanor and punishable by a term of imprisonment of two years or less.

In Binderup v. Holder, the federal district court held that a Pennsylvania state misdemeanor conviction for "corruption of minor" where defendant could have been sentenced to more than 2 years was held NOT to be sufficient to strip defendant of right to bear arms.

This holding is a really big deal.

If appealed, 3d Cir. is likely to affirm the District Ct.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
All freemen can own, possess, and carry .. no laws concerning guns are acceptable.

It's not "Lets Make a Deal" ...

I know....I'm a monster
 
Top