Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Phone makers to enable encryption by default, government orgs mount pouty faces

  1. #1
    Regular Member stealthyeliminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,100

    Phone makers to enable encryption by default, government orgs mount pouty faces

    I've been reading article after article about the decision of Apple and Google to have device encryption enabled in their operating systems by default going forward, and the predictable but despicable response from government agencies throughout the nation.

    Here's a slew of articles that I haven't fully read (I can't remember which ones I've already read):

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...e-data-default
    http://www.techienews.co.uk/9718566/...ne-encryption/
    http://www.pcworld.com/article/26899...ncryption.html
    https://time.com/3450311/attorney-general-apple/

    "Carney accused smartphone companies of offering encryption as “something expressly to allow people to place themselves beyond the law.” Horse ****! I guess it's time to disable encryption in all government datacenters, wouldn't want them to be above the law or anything. ******* idiots. The smartphone companies are making this change expressly to protect their users from lawlessness.
    Advocate freedom please

  2. #2
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    16,690
    They think they are the law......hilarious....

    Who wants to bet there are back doors built into all those encryption codes?
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  3. #3
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    16,690
    Its for our protection!
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    new hampshire
    Posts
    199
    Why do you hate murricuh?[/trashy, mindless, flag-waving, statist idiot]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •