• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

You have to read the "fine print" the anti gunners present.

MSG Laigaie

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
3,241
Location
Philipsburg, Montana
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?123928-No-on-594-Rally

Most of us keep up with what is happening across the USA. We seem to be getting the same kind of bloomy protaganists with the same rhetoric all across the Country. This, I594, is the "gotta have more backgroundchecks/gunshow loophole" bill the antis want as law here. Bad law.

We had our usual "meet&greet" this past weekend and something of a BFO (blinding flash of the obvious) hit us. One of the group, you know and love him as the famous SVG, is a Contractor. Not the mercenary kind, but a true Carpenter. His revelation was this:

Under the proposed "expanded background check" law, he would not be able to pass a nail gun to a co-worker without a nics. He could not issue those tools to his employees without a nics. To compound this, at the end of the day, another nics at tool turn in. In Washington, a firearm is just a powder actuated device that expels a projectile.

Look closely at the proposals the antis are attempting to bring to bear under the BC/GSloophole excuse. A key would be bloomy or moms against sanity, they seem to use the same cr@p everywhere they go.

Post if you find any similarities in your voting area. It is only a conspiracy if it is true.
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
Post if you find any similarities in your voting area. It is only a conspiracy if it is true.

Not in my voting area, but online. Someone thinks a law somehow applies even if it's blatantly un-Constitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled otherwise.

When it comes to such un-Constitutional laws, ignore them. Encourage law enforcement to do the same. After all, they took an oath to the Constitution, not every wayward legislator who scribbled junk on a piece of paper.
 
Top