It is very clear that the majority of voters in Washington, the legislature and Washington courts do not believe that,howerver. Otherwise, marijuana would not be legal in this state, correct? Washington legalized marijuana by a majority vote and neither the legislature nor any court has overturned it despite that fact that it is still 99% illegal by Federal law. So why would those same voters, legislators and courts think that I-591 would require Washington to abide by Federal firearms laws?
That goes along with my point. If they worded the marijuana bill to have a clause like Unless the feds say so......what would have become of marijuana legalization, as it is now our agents are not obligated to enforce federal law in that regard.
I know that often times we get caught up in the is ought/fallacy, many will point out what is, and rightfully so. The feds have taken tremendous amount of unconstitutional power. Than many like myself will point out what ought to be, the feds remaining in there constitutional restrictions. My is that if we accept what is, what ought to be will never happen.
Also why I say is construed is not necessarily by me but by the courts (yet if I can see how it can be, I am pretty sure statist will grasp onto that even quicker), the 2A can't be clearer than how it is yet look how many infringements the courts have allowed upon it. The whole constitution for that matter is pretty clear about the enumerated powers, yet the courts and the powers to be have construed and taken things out of context to grant unconstitutional powers and call it constitutional.
