devldogs55
Regular Member
Estimated ballots on hand to be processed: 299,009
That's not a great number either.
That's not a great number either.
If this passes I'm seriously thinking of moving to Idaho or Alaska.
If this passes I'm seriously thinking of moving to Idaho or Alaska.
95% if not more of the voters are never going to read what they vote for (including those that are elected to legislatures). They are going to believe the ads and the mailers. In this case the pro-gun side did a micro little bit above absolutely nothing to contradict what the ads and mailers were telling the public and we lost because the pro-gun side sat back and did nothing of any meaning to stop it.
On top of that, about the only message the pro-gun put out was how this was going to turn peaceful gun owners into criminals and the general voter doesn't give a rat's butt about that because that is the way they lean anyway - they want to make 90% of gun ownership a crime. We did very little to explain how this was going to hurt them, we only talked about how it was going to hurt gun owners.
And absolutely next will be "assault weapon" bans and magazine capacity limits. And I'll bet the pro-gun side does just as little in the future to stop it, and it'll pass 60-40 just like I-594 did. Assault weapon bans and magazine limits will be even harder to stop because unlike I-594 those things DO only affect gun owners and not the majority of voters. We had our chance to stop the gun control momentum and we blew it - big time - because none of the big organizations like the SAF or NRA would put any effort into getting us going to stop it.
594 has won and we all have lost some Freedom today.
Cesare Beccaria's Essay on Crimes and Punishments-referenced by Thomas Jefferson"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one."
Funny I don't think I lost anything, unconstitutional laws have no weight of law in America and do not have to be followed
Cesare Beccaria's Essay on Crimes and Punishments-referenced by Thomas Jefferson
The exceptions to the law are craftily worded to make ordinary activities involving firearms criminal acts. For example - let's say a college offers a womens' gun safety class in one of their classrooms. In the course of the class, they, of course, have a firearm or two to demonstrate. When that firearm is passed around that classroom for familiarization, everyone who touches it has committed a criminal act if the students did not submit to a background check and document the "transfer" of the firearm - and the instructor will commit a crime when they accept that firearm back if they don't submit to a background check.
I have a range on my own private property. Next door neighbor comes over and we spend an afternoon target shooting. If I handle the neighbor's guns or they handle mine we have both committed criminal acts because we didn't submit background checks and document the "transfers" of the guns.
If I go hunting with a friend and I loan them a firearm in the field - we both commit crimes if we have to walk across a road and they have that firearm in their possession because they didn't submit to a background check and document the "transfer" of the gun.
Another heinous aspect of the new law will be that all of these transfers must be documented and sent to the DOL for recording in the database of sales. Oh, but that isn't registering guns - and not just handguns, but rifles and shotguns now too - "it is just a record of transfers", not firearms registration.
As of 8:38AM November 5th 2014
1,228,364 ballots counted
31.32% voter turnout
377,009 ballots estimated on hand to count
Last updated at 9:47PM November 4th 2014
Seriously folks... Defeatist attitudes much? With only 31.32% of the total possible votes counted, everybody is acting like it's all over. Voters had till 8PM last night to drop off their ballots in a drop box or if they mailed it in, it just had to be postmarked by November 4th. It's going to be quite a while before all the votes are counted.
95% if not more of the voters are never going to read what they vote for (including those that are elected to legislatures). They are going to believe the ads and the mailers...
You are not reading it correctly. /snip
Not true. The voter turnout % is constantly changing because there is no way for them to actually know how many votes are actually in till ALL of them are in and counted. With the fact that who knows how many are actually still in the mail system, and ones still left to be picked up from drop boxes, there are still alot of ballots left to be accounted for and counted.
At 9:15pm last night, the voter turnout % was only 31.13% but as of 9:47pm last night, it had climbed to 31.32%. and the next update is at 10:00am today.
Some counties aren't even going to update till the evening of the 10th, with some updating their results as of the 6th or 7th. Hell, Columbia county won't even update their results till the 25th.
True the voter turnout % is constantly changing since it only includes counted ballots (Counted/Total Registered). True some late ballots are trickling in, which is why you see an increase in on hand ballots to count (it was 2xx,xxx lastnight, its 3xx,xxx today).
Everything I said is absolutely true. The total number of ballots will increase dynamically until all are counted as new ones trickle in and some are counted. However, you can't assume that everyone that's registered voted. You can only go by numbers that are available. Those numbers are a) How many they have counted b) how many they have pending to count, with those two number you can determine the full count at that specific time and determine your percentages and odds. There is no way 594 has a chance of defeat given the current on hand and current spread.