She seems like a snotty bitch.
... wait, what? Try to figure that analogy out!
It's easy peasy - MDA's entire argument is attempting to try to legitimize prior restraint with emotional appeal.
Last edited by stealthyeliminator; 11-04-2014 at 06:42 AM.
Righteous government, or the righteous lack thereof, is the product of a righteous society, not the producer of it.
Her "Cake" is a gun ban... but they aren't there yet, they are saying they have to eat dinner first...
so basically, what she's saying is.. they eventually want a complete ban on firearms, but they are taking what they think they can get now, and will keep chipping away at it until they can get a whole ban in place... no matter what lies or propaganda they have to use.
Haven't listen to the linked video yet but looking at the quoted words I see something rather curious.
no open carry cake for you before dinner - transposing position = "no open carry for you", leaving "cake before dinner." Cake =pieces of sweets - getting Target to say No Guns would be sweet for them. Dinner = total ban, eating us alive.
So we have "No open carry for you. First Target, then total ban."
Too far out? Am I forcing what I want to see or is there a code there for MDA members??
You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC
Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.