SCOTUS has said three times that concealed carry is not a right. It wasn't just 19th and early 20th century state cases which held that there is no right to concealed carry, every court, state and Federal, since Bliss v. Commonwealth in 1822 has held that there is no right to carry a concealed weapon. Including the Peruta decision which said "To be clear, we are not holding that the Second Amendment requires the states to permit concealed carry."
I do not understand why there are so many people who simply cannot comprehend why it is that when a right is incorporated to the states via the 14th Amendment, the right is incorporated to the states as the right was understood in 1868 when the 14th Amendment was adopted. In 1868 it was clearly understood that only cowards and criminals carried concealed weapons and therefore concealed carry was not a right. Here in California, in 1868, there was an absolute statewide prohibition on concealed carry excepting only travelers while on a journey and police. No permits, state or local, could be issued regardless of the reason.
Incorporation of a right via the 14th Amendment is as simple to understand as why we don't put diesel fuel into the tank of a motor vehicle powered by gasoline. If one does not understand the "why?" then he'll simply have to accept the fact, as much as he dislikes it, that this is just the way it is.