From the California sub-forum:
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...eruta-v-San-Diego-Motions-to-Intervene-Denied
*****************************
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...-En-Banc-Shall-Issue-for-Ninth-Circuit-Upheld
Excerpt from the above 2nd link/post (in "News & Political Alerts" sub-forum):
"Hawaii just lost its highly restrictive permiting "may issue" scheme that prevented nearly anyone but a few security guards from carrying arms in Hawaii (outside of government officials). It appears that the only alternative is for the Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit ruling. Who would have standing to appeal is unclear. Both Sheriff Gore and San Diego County have indicated that they will not appeal."
***********************************
Here is another article (which gives more info and in more understandable layman's terms) seen elsewhere on this latest development:
http://www.ammoland.com/2014/11/per...issue-for-ninth-circuit-upheld/#axzz3IvCv9Dfa
Excerpt from the 3rd link's article:
"Today, 12 November, 2014, the Ninth Circuit denied the motions to intervene, thus denying requests for an en banc hearing for the decision. Therefore, Peruta stands as the law of the land in the Ninth Circuit. This means that effectively, some version of “shall issue” carry law will become law in all of the Ninth Circuit."
***********************************
...and Hawaii is in the 9th Circuit.