I took it as sarcasm.
I'm saying, in a nutshell, that the people who are making (and supporting) laws that are blatantly unconstitutional, and those who are enforcing those laws, are the criminals. The person who is simply exercising a right that not only predated government itself, but also that each individual in that government swore an oath to uphold, makes the representative of the .gov the criminal, not the accused.
There was no penalty attached to either the constitution or its oaths and the breaking of them, because at the time the concepts were instituted, any punishment would have been considered rude and redundant, as those people had sworn against their own lives to do as they said they would. The tradition would be then, that the person taking the oath is promoting their promise above the value of their own life.
This generation has lost sight of that concept, and as a result, we have legislated anarchy. I'm trying to eliminate that anarchy.
I keep preaching oaths because the oath is the key to peace between the government and its people. It;s the glue that holds the whole thing together. All the talk about revolution and most of the rebellions going on these days would immediately cease if the people in the .gov would uphold their oaths. Police being but one of the many groups of people tasked with maintaining our country. People wont fight for rights they have. They wont hate a government that treats them as adults and with respect.