Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Peruta v. San Diego - November 26, 2014 - Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc

  1. #1
    Regular Member California Right To Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    463

    Exclamation Peruta v. San Diego - November 26, 2014 - Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc

    Peruta v. San Diego Appeal 10-56971
    Update November 26, 2014 - Attorney General Harris today filed a Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc. The Brady Bunch is reportedly filing their own petition today as well.

    http://blog.californiarighttocarry.org/?page_id=1575
    Concealed carry is of no use to me, I don't carry a purse.

    Charles Nichols – President of California Right To Carry
    http://CaliforniaRightToCarry.org

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    They should re-title the pleadings .. "COMMUNIST MANIFESTO" ... is a more proper title.

  3. #3
    Regular Member California Right To Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    463

    Exclamation Dec. 3, 2014 Order to respond to latest petition

    Update December 3, 2014 - An Order was published today which pretty much guarantees that there will NOT be any resolution in Peruta this year:

    “Plaintiff-Appellants are directed to file a response to Proposed Intervenor Appellee’s
    petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed with this Court on
    November 26, 2014. The response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages, and
    shall be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order.”
    Concealed carry is of no use to me, I don't carry a purse.

    Charles Nichols – President of California Right To Carry
    http://CaliforniaRightToCarry.org

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •