• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

News agencies still reporting on original Grisham arrest as if recent

stealthyeliminator

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
3,100
Location
Texas
So, some news workers are still pulling up the original Grisham arrest and miscommunicating that it occurred recently... But anyway, what I found interesting are the analysts' comments that the arresting officer seemed poorly trained and as though he invented a reason to arrest so that he wouldn't have to take the cuffs off. They're still having a hard time letting go the notion that a citizen did "something wrong" when they're unlawfully arrested, though.

http://www.myfoxhouston.com/Clip/10940777/open-carry-sparks-investigation
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Fox and most other media are not well known for their fact checking.

Watching that video still angers me as much as it did the first time I saw it.

Cannot figure out how the Sgt. was interfering with the duties of a police officer for which he was found guilty.:cuss:

That and "exercising a privilege"? - it is a RIGHT.

Does anyone remember why this verdict wasn't appealed?
 
Last edited:

stealthyeliminator

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
3,100
Location
Texas
Fox and most other media are not well known for their fact checking.

Watching that video still angers me as much as it did the first time I saw it.

Cannot figure out how the Sgt. was interfering with the duties of a police officer for which he was found guilty.:cuss:

That and "exercising a privilege"? - it is a RIGHT.

Does anyone remember why this verdict wasn't appealed?

Appeal was filed but that's all I know off the top of my head. I'll try to get more info.

I agree on him calling it a privilege, very annoying and misleading.

I think the conviction was obtained only because the trial was a sham. I think the city spent a lot of money making sure it was, too.

http://kdhnews.com/news/crime/grish...cle_1c848bd8-1dd4-11e4-a084-0017a43b2370.html
 
Last edited:

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Appeal was filed but that's all I know off the top of my head. I'll try to get more info.

I agree on him calling it a privilege, very annoying and misleading.

I think the conviction was obtained only because the trial was a sham. I think the city spent a lot of money making sure it was, too.

http://kdhnews.com/news/crime/grish...cle_1c848bd8-1dd4-11e4-a084-0017a43b2370.html
Found this regarding filing the appeal, but no date given for it.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/11/t...-2000-dashcam-video-released-open-carry-case/
 

stealthyeliminator

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
3,100
Location
Texas
The results of many jury trials have caused me to lose quite a bit of faith in society. Even when verdicts turn out correctly, statements by the jurors after the trail make me hang my head in disappointment...
 
Top