More "gun guilt."
I happened across this article tonight. Two unrelated but similar crimes, one of the suspects was apparently openly carrying a properly holstered pistol at the time of his arrest.
The article gives fairly prominent mention of this:
"During the arrest a holstered .40 caliber Smith and Wesson semi-automatic handgun was discovered in his possession."
So... was the pistol pertinent to the story? Or is this just more anti-gun bias, tainting the otherwise lawful gun possession with the despicable crimes the man is accused of?
Louisa Sheriff’s Office arrests former dispatcher ... for online solicitation of minors
ETA: Another article says it this way:
"[The accused] was carrying a .40-caliber semi-automatic handgun in a holster when he was arrested."
Last edited by TFred; 01-30-2015 at 08:04 PM. Reason: Add second article.
More "gun guilt."
You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC
Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.
The reaction will be: to disarm all public officials?
It's anti-gun bias.
A .40-caliber Smith and Wesson semiautomatic handgun is a frightening thing to behold. Having it in a holster just makes it easier for the perp to get his hands on it and start spraying busloads of nuns taking blind orphans to a birthday party.
Pardon me while I Godwinize, but just how big is a "caliber"? If I knew that I'd know how big .40 of one was. Those pesky hyphens cause problems second only to misplaced commas.
But soon I will not have to be disconcerted at such writing, for Bloomberg is paying to send reporters to classes where they will learn all about handguns and how to properly report on how eevillll they are.
"He'll regret it to his dying day....if ever he lives that long."----The Quiet Man
Because stupidity isn't a race, and everybody can win.
"No matter how much contempt you have for the media in all this, you don't have enough"
Goes back to an earlier discussion we had. I will not be giving my money to their obvious left-wing perspective/agenda.
Also has another thread of logic to it: Presumed innocent until proven guilty; yet along with said charges, the media will announce everything in your possession, impersonal or not. Free country, I suppose - unless you are carrying something for self-defense.
I can only imagine the reporter's salivation at coming across this golden opportunity to freely berate a gun-carrier. Because of the crime the man is accused of, nobody, not even the staunchest of gun-rights supporters, could dare comment to call them out on this obvious propaganda, for fear of being misrepresented as supporting the alleged crime.
ETA: For example: "Oh, you believe we should ALLOW child molesters to carry GUNS!!??"
Last edited by TFred; 01-31-2015 at 11:26 AM.