Well, at least that answers my question I posed. So you want the government to be able to restrict someone's right to self-defense by bearing arms based on the testimony of one person for which no evidence exists of the truth of their claim? Have you even read this bill or are you just believing the anti-gun groups' propaganda?
When I was getting divorced my ex-wife filed for a restraining order against me which would have removed my firearms rights. I was extremely lucky the judge had a tiny little bit of common sense left when he denied her restraining order based solely on the fact that we were already living 1,300 miles apart.
People file ridiculous claims every day and this bill would allow the court to "on an ex parte basis, pending a full hearing, enjoining the subject of the petition from having in his or her custody or control, purchasing, possessing, or receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive, a firearm or dangerous weapon." Do you understand what the terms "ex parte" and "pending a full hearing" mean? That means that someone's "family or household member" can request the court to order your guns confiscated without ever having to see you or your lawyer or give you a chance to defend yourself and the bill requires the court to make that decision on the same day that the request is filed! Is that what you really want?
