http://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2015-16/Pdf/Bills/House Bills/1857-S.pdf
First, here's the list of who can request the order (pages 1 and 2):
17 NEW SECTION. Sec. 2. For the purposes of this chapter "family
18 or household member" means spouses, domestic partners, former
19 spouses, former domestic partners, persons who have a child in common
20 regardless of whether they have been married or have lived together
1 at any time, adult persons related by blood or marriage, adult
2 persons who are presently residing together or who have resided
3 together in the past year, persons sixteen years of age or older who
4 are presently residing together or who have resided together in the
5 past year and who have or have had a dating relationship, persons
6 sixteen years of age or older with whom a person sixteen years of age
7 or older has or has had a dating relationship, and persons who have a
8 biological or legal parent-child relationship, including stepparents
9 and stepchildren and grandparents and grandchildren.
Pretty wide definition of "family or household member". Second, the part where any of those listed above, + law enforcement officers, get the opportunity to screw you over without you ever appearing before the judge (and that's due process?) (page 2):
10 NEW SECTION. Sec. 3. (1) A family or household member of a
11 person or a law enforcement officer may file a petition requesting
12 that the court issue an emergency extreme risk protection order on an
13 ex parte basis, pending a full hearing, enjoining the subject of the
14 petition from having in his or her custody or control, purchasing,
15 possessing, or receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive, a
16 firearm or dangerous weapon.
Here's where the judge gets 1 day maximum to "examine the evidence" (pages 2-3):
37 (4) An emergency extreme risk protection order must be issued or
38 denied on the same day the petition is submitted to the court, unless
39 the petition is filed too late in the day to permit effective review,
1 in which case the order must be issued or denied on the next day of
2 judicial business in sufficient time for the order to be filed that
3 day with the clerk of the court. The court may hold the emergency
4 hearing in person or by telephone.
This is where your purchase of a firearm or ammo in the last six months can be used as evidence against you (page 4):
5 (4) In determining whether grounds for an emergency extreme risk
6 protection order exist, the court may consider any other evidence of
7 an increased risk for violence including, but not limited to,
8 evidence of any of the following:
17 (e) Evidence of recent acquisition of firearms, ammunition, or
18 other dangerous weapons.
19 (5) For purposes of this section, "recent" means within the six
20 months prior to the date the petition was filed.
This is where you only get two weeks
maximum to find a lawyer and defend yourself against a 1 year extension of the order (page 4):
28 (7) Within fourteen days after the date of issuance of the order,
29 before the court that issued the order or another court in the same
30 jurisdiction, the court shall hold a hearing pursuant to section 6 of
31 this act to determine if an extreme risk protection order should be
32 issued under this chapter.
If you get an order issued against you, you get one AND ONLY ONE chance at a request to have the order terminated per year (page 8):
26 NEW SECTION. Sec. 8. (1) A person subject to an extreme risk
27 protection order may submit one written request per year at any time
28 during the effective period of the order for a hearing to terminate
29 the order.
This bill is designed to give a single judge the power to remove your right to keep and bear arms for 1 year at a time while placing the subject of the order at an extreme disadvantage at being able to defend themselves against the order.
Purging databases is something the state just does not do unless they are sued.