The part I bold-faced aligns perfectly with a quote I very much like from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Union Pacific Rail Co. vs Botsford.
Originally Posted by countryclubjoe
No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law.
It was quoted by a later SCOTUS, in Terry v Ohio, (turn on sarcasm here) a few paragraphs before SCOTUS said was OK for detective McFadden to seize Mr. Terry and search him when the law was not clear and unquestionable on that point. (Otherwise, why did the case make it to SCOTUS to get sorted out? And, why did the dissent say the court was granting to police more power to search and seize than magistrates?)