• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Stargate SG-1's FN P90. Yes, it's real, and in use throughout the U.S. today.

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
In 1991, FN Herstal in Belgium created the FN P90 in response to NATO requests for a replacement for 9×19mm Parabellum firearms. The P90 was designed as a compact but powerful firearm for vehicle crews, operators of crew-served weapons, support personnel, special forces and counter-terrorist groups.

The FN 5.7×28mm is a small-caliber, high-velocity cartridge and exhibits an exceptionally flat trajectory. It has the ability to penetrate Kevlar protective vests—such as the NATO CRISAT vest—that will stop conventional pistol bullets. Fired from the P90, the SS190 is capable of penetrating the CRISAT vest at a range of 200 m (219 yd), or a Level IIIA Kevlar vest at the same range. However, sporting variants of the 5.7×28mm are classified by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) as not armor-piercing.

SO, then... Will someone PLEASE explain to me why the ATF classifies a non-armor-piercing round like the 5.56 M855 as "armor-piercing" while FAILING to classify the armor-piercing 5.7×28mm as such?

Oh, yeah... It's because many law enforcement agencies in the U.S. are already using this Stargate FN P90 weapon. Yes. It's the same one seen in Stargate SG-1.

320_001c.jpg


p90.jpg


Stargate FN P90 - US Users.jpg
 
Last edited:

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
Are you aware of how the ATF classifies pistol ammunition as 'armor piercing'?

The SS190 is classified as 'armor piercing' due to the ratio of jacket weight to projectile weight.
The SS195, SS196, SS197, SS198 and American Eagle 5728 are all classified as non 'armor piercing' by the ATF.
 

Kopis

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
674
Location
Nashville, TN
SS109/XM855 are not classified as AP is my limited understanding. Ive heard some people say the steel tip reduces lead consumption but others said the steel tip helps the bullet maintain trajectory through light objects like windows or doors. However, any 556 through a 16-20" barrel would easily penetrate any level III vest inside 100 yards.

Shooting an SS109/XM855 through a short pistol barreled weapon (like an AR pistol or FN P90) reduces the bullet velocity so much that it doesnt have any additional penetrating capabilities over a "regular" 556 though. Ive shot steel with my 7.5" barreled pistol and XM855s do nothing to steel at close range even. But if you pop them in your 16" gun, the steel tip pushes deeper than the lead core but not by much.
 

Aknazer

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
1,760
Location
California
SS109/XM855 are not classified as AP is my limited understanding. Ive heard some people say the steel tip reduces lead consumption but others said the steel tip helps the bullet maintain trajectory through light objects like windows or doors. However, any 556 through a 16-20" barrel would easily penetrate any level III vest inside 100 yards.

Shooting an SS109/XM855 through a short pistol barreled weapon (like an AR pistol or FN P90) reduces the bullet velocity so much that it doesnt have any additional penetrating capabilities over a "regular" 556 though. Ive shot steel with my 7.5" barreled pistol and XM855s do nothing to steel at close range even. But if you pop them in your 16" gun, the steel tip pushes deeper than the lead core but not by much.

My AR500 plates would like to have a word with you. Now if you meant IIIa it might be different, but level III is designed for non-AP rifle rounds.
 

MAC702

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
6,331
Location
Nevada
...the SS190 is capable of penetrating the CRISAT vest at a range of 200 m (219 yd), or a Level IIIA Kevlar vest at the same range. However, sporting variants of the 5.7×28mm are classified by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) as not armor-piercing.

SO, then... Will someone PLEASE explain to me why the ATF classifies a non-armor-piercing round like the 5.56 M855 as "armor-piercing" while FAILING to classify the armor-piercing 5.7×28mm as such?...

You are getting confused from their lack of details.

The AP rounds of 5.7x28mm are banned from importation and manufacture. What little is still on the market is extremely expensive.

You are also talking about different kinds of armor and definitions of "armor-piercing" all in the same breath.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
:lol:

Just be glad Pontiac didn't design the FN P90, or it would be in the shop more than not.:)
It is quite possible that Fallschirmjäger may have liked the look of the Aztec while also not knowing anything about its eventual design/reliability issues. It is arguably the first crossover SUV after all.

Though, it is important that the adults take time to actually look at the macaroni art work, lest the kids in the room, who like macaroni art work, and made the macaroni art work, start ignoring them because they have become irrelevant old dudes because they don't like macaroni art work.
 

Fallschirjmäger

Active member
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
3,823
Location
Cumming, Georgia, USA
It is quite possible that Fallschirmjäger may have liked the look of the Aztec while also not knowing anything about its eventual design/reliability issues. It is arguably the first crossover SUV after all.

Though, it is important that the adults take time to actually look at the macaroni art work, lest the kids in the room, who like macaroni art work, and made the macaroni art work, start ignoring them because they have become irrelevant old dudes because they don't like macaroni art work.
Sorry, I was never much impressed by the Pontiac Aztec.
You seem a bit fixated on personal insults rather than a discussion of the cons/pros of the FN system. If it were otherwise I'd be happy to engage you as an adult, but alas, I'm much too old for the schoolyard.

Just as an aside... the AMC Eagle predated the Pontiac Aztec by more than a decade. As did several European produced vehicles (having owned one in Germany a decade before the Aztec came on the scene)
 
Last edited:

Elm Creek Smith

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2013
Messages
204
Location
In the county.
However, any 556 through a 16-20" barrel would easily penetrate any level III vest inside 100 yards.

Any 5.56x45mm through a 16 to 20 inch barrel will NOT penetrate any Level III vest inside 100 yards. Almost any centerfire rifle cartridge will penetrate a Level III-A vest inside 100 yards. That's why they have Level III and Level IV rifle plates.
 
Last edited:

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,452
Location
White Oak Plantation
Sorry, I was never much impressed by the Pontiac Aztec.
You seem a bit fixated on personal insults rather than a discussion of the cons/pros of the FN system. If it were otherwise I'd be happy to engage you as an adult, but alas, I'm much too old for the schoolyard.

Just as an aside... the AMC Eagle predated the Pontiac Aztec by more than a decade. As did several European produced vehicles (having owned one in Germany a decade before the Aztec came on the scene)
You injected infantile adult chides, not I. Reasonable is as reasonable does.

BTW, the eagle was a station wagon. ;)
 

OC Freedom

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
646
Location
ADA County, ID
Sorry, I was never much impressed by the Pontiac Aztec.
You seem a bit fixated on personal insults rather than a discussion of the cons/pros of the FN system. If it were otherwise I'd be happy to engage you as an adult, but alas, I'm much too old for the schoolyard.

Just as an aside... the AMC Eagle predated the Pontiac Aztec by more than a decade. As did several European produced vehicles (having owned one in Germany a decade before the Aztec came on the scene)

OC For Me is correct, the AMC Eagle was a 4x4 wagon and was way nicer looking than the Aztec. Why buy an Eagle or an Aztec, when Subaru was making an all wheel drive station wagon when both of these models were being produced. The Subaru looked better and would not be in the repair shop as often if ever.

To stay on topic, the FN P90 is still fugly. If one is killing Jaffa on an off world mission, then one should look good doing it and using a FN P90 will just make you look like a Geek. Would you rather drive an Aztec, or a 1967 corvette. ;)
 
Top