Citizen
Founder's Club Member
Just to clarify, I don't have an endless supply of questions- in fact, before my last post I have asked exactly 3 over 50 pages. Repetitively, yes, but that'd because it took quite some time for anyone to answer them directly without a redirection away from my question.
Besides that- an interesting response, but remember that I am not suggesting any kind of government or lack of government system, YOU are. I'm curious about what your system would do to address these things.
I will reflect on your questions to myself, but I'll still wait for you to answer mine, as you are the one suggesting anarchy as a societal organization.
If you would prefer not to answer them, then by all means, carry on.
As for point #4- you might want to reclarify your direct answer, it's a bit vague. From what I understand....basically nothing other than mitigation, yes?
Well, first, regarding me suggesting a particular form of government, not exactly. It was a snarky comment from another poster that prompted this thread. It was actually part of a different thread, but was splintered off at the suggestion of two posters. Second, no hiding by acting like you have the initiative by asking questions. Even if you only asked three questions, you've still had tons and tons and tons of explanations posted to this thread, even if they were not directed to you. More than enough for you to take the ball and run with it if you were genuinely interested in consensual government, rather than playing contrarian or naysayer. So:
Come, come. Lets hear your suggestions and solutions. I'll even be generous. The fact you have to think over my questions totally reveals you have not researched the issues, supporting the possible conclusion you were not even aware of them. So, I will overlook that you had thirty pages of thread to look up answers before now, but didn't. Take your time to look things over.
And, really. Lets just focus on one. Lets just start with your first, the monetary system.
Last edited: