I thought the entire exchange was rather tame compared to a lot of the back and forth we get here. Those guys are really sensitive over there.
I think you were a little more verbose over there than you are here.
I feel deprived that I get comparatively so few of your thoughts articulated so thoroughly over here.
Final thought:
OCDO is dedicated to OC. The regulars and mods will commonly remind those that make CC specific posts that such is off topic. Some might even get the impression that some regulars here are opposed to CC.
I personally believe that support for OC does not, should not, mean opposition to CC; And vice versa. And I know the other guy asked for thoughts on the subject. It also appears that the Glock forum is not overtly dedicated to CC.
That all said, those who do support OC to the extent that they might sometimes give the impression they are not huge fans of CC--and yet would never accept that this means they add any "buts" to the RKBA--should be first to appreciate and respect that some who sincerely support the RKBA might also favor CC to the extent they are not fans of OC.
Of course, the moment it moves from a question about just OC vs CC into overtly supporting mandatory training, mandatory permits, etc, rather than constitutional carry, there can be no doubt that someone is not (yet) fully supportive of the RKBA.
Even then, I think we do well to see where we can find areas of agreement and ability to work together rather than highlighting differences. A guy who actively opposes any aspect of my RKBA has be viewed as an opponent. A guy who will actively support some or most of my RKBA while not opposing me on the rest is not an opponent; He is an ally at least part of the time. He may well come along later. But no need to make an opponent where there isn't one.
As my Libertarian friends used to say, "If you're not wanting to ride all the way to Libertopia, climb on the bus and ride as far toward freedom as you want and then climb off. We can fight each other at that point. Let's work together as long as we have a common goal."
Charles