• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Easter celebration

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
I don't know why the previous Easter celebration thread was closed. http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...y-of-an-Executed-Traitor-Overcomig-the-System

Hopefully Grapeshot doesn't hate Christians.

Happy Easter everyone. Thank God for His son.

Grapeshot has indicated he holds Christian beliefs, so I doubt he hates Christians.

My guess for the thread closing would be another member failed to realize Christ was viewed a traitor and subversive by Rome and the Sanhedrin, and complained to Grapeshot. I kinda doubt Grapeshot would have missed that point. Since I didn't spell that out, I guess it opened the door to some member complaining.

The thread lock is in the past. No point dwelling on it now. I would almost rather discuss Christ's message in this thread.
 
Last edited:

stealthyeliminator

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
3,100
Location
Texas
Absolutely, Citizen.

So, who here hasn't heard the story of the Resurrection, but would like to know what it's all about?

Does anyone have any links to videos of good Easter sermons from this year?!?!?
 
Last edited:

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
Absolutely, Citizen.

So, who here hasn't heard the story of the Resurrection, but would like to know what it's all about?

Does anyone have any links to videos of good Easter sermons from this year?!?!?

Thanks.

I don't have any Easter sermon videos, but I don't mind discussing my observations and conclusions.

For non-Christians who are not familiar, Easter is the holiday celebrating perhaps one of the most important demonstrations in Western philosophy: Christ demonstrated it is possible to continue to exist, self-aware, after the body stops functioning. Christ had many messages in His ministry; the Resurrection among the most important of all, subordinate perhaps only to the possibility of a better existence (Heaven).

I have to take care of something just now; I'll be back, looking forward to further discussion, especially the tie-in to rights and freedom.
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
yawn....

how's the Jews, Hindu, Islam, Buddhist, Bahá'í, Pagan, Wicken, agnostic, atheist, and the other gaggle of non-Christian folk doing today?

any of these groups wish to chat how they spent their time over Easter?

ipse
 

georg jetson

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
2,416
Location
Slidell, Louisiana
Thanks.

I don't have any Easter sermon videos, but I don't mind discussing my observations and conclusions.

For non-Christians who are not familiar, Easter is the holiday celebrating perhaps one of the most important demonstrations in Western philosophy: Christ demonstrated it is possible to continue to exist, self-aware, after the body stops functioning. Christ had many messages in His ministry; the Resurrection among the most important of all, subordinate perhaps only to the possibility of a better existence (Heaven).

I have to take care of something just now; I'll be back, looking forward to further discussion, especially the tie-in to rights and freedom.

The resurrection is the most important. However, I don't think the message of a better life after resurrection is a different message. A better life after is pointless without the resurrection.

As far as how it relates to freedom, Christianity is a volunteer-type way of life. We don't "do" or "not do" certain things in order to earn some entitlement to be resurrected. We do or don't do certain things because the resurrection is a free gift and so we are free to do things because we WANT to.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
The resurrection is the most important. However, I don't think the message of a better life after resurrection is a different message. A better life after is pointless without the resurrection.

As far as how it relates to freedom, Christianity is a volunteer-type way of life. We don't "do" or "not do" certain things in order to earn some entitlement to be resurrected. We do or don't do certain things because the resurrection is a free gift and so we are free to do things because we WANT to.

I get your point. I agree partly.

Regarding the Resurrection being the most important and a better life being pointless without resurrection, I would tend more in the direction that a better existence is the whole point, resurrection being necessary to overcome death of the body in this life, i.e., the current existence. The Resurrection may be the most important event for the broadly applicable significance demonstrated to people who had decided they ceased to exist upon the death of their body--no argument there-- but, I would argue that His message of a better existence (Heaven) is the most important of all.

I agree more than I said at first with your comments about Christian actions being voluntary. I think it can be taken even further. Here is what I mean by that. If the thing behind the eyes that is aware of itself is a spirit, a soul, capable of existing independently of the body while remaining aware of itself,* then that necessarily introduces a number of lines of inquiry, the bottom of which includes self-determination, free will. The automatic result of free will is the desire to have the liberty to implement the designs and plans created by that free will. Or, perhaps more precisely, the gift of free will necessarily includes the liberty to implement that free will. Of course, that immediately leads into committing harms against others and so forth, but that is the next strata of importances/logics/postulates. My point here, is that liberty is hard-wired into human nature by the Creator. It is part and parcel, inseparable from human nature--unalienable.


*I consider this another very important aspect of His demonstration (the Resurrection). Among other things, He was proving by personal demonstration that people are a unit of self-awareness independent of the body. This, in and of itself, is monumental. It is one thing to suggest that some part of you can continue to exist after your body dies, and exist better; it is something else to imply you exist independent of the body. This would touch to the very nature of a man. What is he?
 
Last edited:

georg jetson

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
2,416
Location
Slidell, Louisiana
I get your point. I agree partly.

Regarding the Resurrection being the most important and a better life being pointless without resurrection, I would tend more in the direction that a better existence is the whole point, resurrection being necessary to overcome death of the body in this life, i.e., the current existence. The Resurrection may be the most important event for the broadly applicable significance demonstrated to people who had decided they ceased to exist upon the death of their body--no argument there-- but, I would argue that His message of a better existence (Heaven) is the most important of all.

I agree more than I said at first with your comments about Christian actions being voluntary. I think it can be taken even further. Here is what I mean by that. If the thing behind the eyes that is aware of itself is a spirit, a soul, capable of existing independently of the body while remaining aware of itself,* then that necessarily introduces a number of lines of inquiry, the bottom of which includes self-determination, free will. The automatic result of free will is the desire to have the liberty to implement the designs and plans created by that free will. Or, perhaps more precisely, the gift of free will necessarily includes the liberty to implement that free will. Of course, that immediately leads into committing harms against others and so forth, but that is the next strata of importances/logics/postulates. My point here, is that liberty is hard-wired into human nature by the Creator. It is part and parcel, inseparable from human nature--unalienable.


*I consider this another very important aspect of His demonstration (the Resurrection). Among other things, He was proving by personal demonstration that people are a unit of self-awareness independent of the body. This, in and of itself, is monumental. It is one thing to suggest that some part of you can continue to exist after your body dies, and exist better; it is something else to imply you exist independent of the body. This would touch to the very nature of a man. What is he?

Yes yes! Liberty must be hard-wired into us because we must have context for our choice. A creator who asks his creations to have "faith" in him without giving him the liberty to do so amounts to the creator creating puppets.

The Bible has a lot to say about what we are and what we may become. The part about abusing liberty is explained as our fallen condition.
 

georg jetson

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
2,416
Location
Slidell, Louisiana
South African Quaker cosmologist and physicist George F. R. Ellis argues for a moral/ethical dimension to the space of states of the universe in On The Moral Nature of the universe: Cosmology, Theology, and Ethics. (Fortress Press, 1996) with Nancey Murphy.

Considering the possibilities consistent with time as fundamental, and space emergent only, all possibilities will be realized in infinite time repeatedly and in all variations. We are unique only in this infinitesimal. My creed: This universe, at least, has a God, Creator of Heaven, energy and Spirit, and Creator of Earth, matter and the Son Incarnate, inspired by the Spirit, and born of the Virgin.

I discovered Ellis as the keynote speaker at the Sixteenth Krakow Methodological Conference, delivering the 2012 Copernicus Center Lecture, "On the nature of cosmology today."

The keynote
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq8-eLGpEHc&list=PLuqpwpkBmbAmDLE4q5cr_ianG-o24Y0I2&index=15

The proceedings
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuqpwpkBmbAmDLE4q5cr_ianG-o24Y0I2

It is a fallacy to apply statistics to the question of the existance of a Creator. There is only "one" everything. Also, the definition of a Creator is the creator of everything. He's simply side stepping the issue.
 
Last edited:

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
Well, I certainly got left in the dust quick by those last two posts. I thought I could hold my own in almost any theological discussion, but I see I was mistaken.

Time to brush myself off, and brush myself up.

:D
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
Which fallacy, formal or informal, would that be?

Beware the informal fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantiam, the 'ignorance' here being lack of contrary evidence.

Exactly. I could claim, "There's a gnome in my backyard. Prove me wrong." Lack of evidence to the contrary is never evidence for the premise.
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
Does anyone have any links to videos of good Easter sermons from this year?!?!?

I generally avoid overt religious discussions on these kinds of forums as they have real potential to divide rather than unite. But since you ask specifically....

I watched two particularly powerful sermons on Christ's grace and resurrection as part of the semi-annual LDS general conference on Easter Sunday. There are some particulars of these sermons that are different than many Christians believe. But I think the overall message should be universally enjoyed and appreciated by all Christians, and even many who are not Christians.

In each case, the printed transcript is immediately below the video window. But there is a beauty and power in the spoken word that is sometimes lost in just the transcript.

This sermon discusses specifically the grace of Christ.

This sermon starts with one of the most beautiful and powerful analogies of Christ's love for us that I've heard.

Finally, this short video (< 3 minutes) is not a traditional sermon, but a montage of images and thoughts about the Savior.

Charles
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
I am not a christian and am very agnostic, lately leaning atheist simply to test it out.

What I do find awesome about this Hebrew carpenter is that he took complicated (laws made complicated by those in charge) and broke them down to simple parables and illustrations so that the common person could easily grasp "the law".

When I read and look at the history it was a case of the leaders (Pharisees and Saducees) who despised him for being able to make it easy for the common person to understand and showing their hypocrisy who used the state to have him killed. Even the governor didn't want to have him killed under the guise of treason although he caved to avoid trouble with the leaders of Judah.
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
What I do find awesome about this Hebrew carpenter is that he took complicated (laws made complicated by those in charge) and broke them down to simple parables and illustrations so that the common person could easily grasp "the law".

When I read and look at the history it was a case of the leaders (Pharisees and Saducees) who despised him for being able to make it easy for the common person to understand and showing their hypocrisy who used the state to have him killed. Even the governor didn't want to have him killed under the guise of treason although he caved to avoid trouble with the leaders of Judah.

One of the most common mistakes people make regarding Jesus these days is to try to shoehorn him into some modern political philosophy.

Conservatives are sure Jesus would be republican (or at least that He wants everyone to belong to the GOP), because abortion is wrong, because He told his disciples to acquire swords, or just because the left is anti-religion. Liberals figure similar things about being a Democrat because Jesus helped the poor, gave them free food, told us not to judge, forgave the woman taken in adultery, told people to keep their prayers private,and told the rich man to sell all he had and give the money to the poor. Libertarians figure they are on the side of angels because Jesus never forced anyone to follow him, it was always a free choice.

It seems anarchists are prone to the same error. Many who rejected Him at the time did so because they wanted a Messiah to free them from Roman rule, to cast off the unwanted government. Even some who followed Him hoped He would do just that at some point. That wasn't His mission.

It is like the old parable of 4 or 5 blind men describing an elephant and all of them getting it wrong.

Even in the political climate of His times, Jesus transcended political and social labels, or at least avoided them. He rendered to Caesar that which was Caesar, even paying taxes (though obtaining the funds to do so miraculously). I am not an expert in ancient Hebrew/Jewish law, but I have been told that Jesus strictly observed "the law" as it had been given to Moses, he never violated a single tenant thereof. He lived a perfect life and so would have had to have perfectly abided the commandments from God. He simply declined to be bound by tradition that had been built up around the law, but did not actually have any force of law.

So He certainly doesn't fit into any modern, flawed, political philosophy.

My religious beliefs certainly influence my world view and are part of the reason I'm a conservative republican. But the exact same thing is true of fellow members of my congregation who are democrats and libertarians. This is as it should be. It would be a weak faith or religion that didn't influence our social and political views.

As an agnostic/atheist, this doesn't apply to you so much. But men of faith need to remember the critical--if subtle--difference between having our social and political views informed by our faith in Jesus and actually thinking that those views represent the only proper embodiment of the Gospel of Christ.

A man's faith is a most sacred thing and I think it most offensive and counterproductive for any man to question the religious faith, devotion, sincerity, or correctness of any other man based on differences in social or political views or affiliation.

I see far too much of this among many in my church and political party who are prone to question the religious devotion of Sen. Harry Reid who belongs to the same church, but to the other major political party. I expect that Sen. Reid and I don't agree on very much politically. In many cases I do not know how he squares his religious beliefs with his political conduct. But Jesus expressly forbid me from rendering judgement on matters of another man's religious devotion or standing before God. That is between that man and God; it is not my business.

I don't suspect you intended to broach any of these topics with your post. And I don't intend to continue in any such political discussions on this thread. For Christians, Easter is the crowning event in the life and ministry of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. It and He are God's gift to us. They have nothing to do with politics or even social theory. They are the answer to the age old question, "If a man die, shall he live again." And the answer is "YES. Most assuredly yes we shall."

I hope all who believe or hope to believe had a very good Passover, Easter, and/or Pascha, as the case may be.

Charles
 
Last edited:

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
[mocking of what others hold sacred redacted]

It is most unfortunate to see presumably mature adults who belong to a group who so often quote Heinlein about an armed society being a polite society, publicly mocking what others hold sacred when there is zero need to do so.

Certainly we can and should behave better.

Charles
 
Last edited:

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
It is most unfortunate to see presumably mature adults who belong to a group who so often quote Heinlein about an armed society being a polite society, publicly mocking what others hold sacred when there is zero need to do so.

Oh, snap!

Just because someone decides to hold something sacred, suddenly he's immune and others cannot speak their minds? Sounds like a pretty weak argument to me--a fella can either defend why he holds it sacred or he can't. Calling "sacred" is just an attempt to tar the other fella and/or avoid having to make a defense.

What if I join the KKK and decide to hold the doctrine of white supremacy sacred? Ha! I win! I declare white supremacy sacred to me! You can't criticize me! Nya, nya, nah, nyaa!!

<phfft>

Who cares if somebody heaves harsh opposing views into a thread on Easter. Dang it! Wasn't forgiveness one of Christ's messages? How about tolerance? How about just ignoring the poster, or using it as an opportunity to refute him, the refutation maybe winning a soul here and there who maybe hadn't thought about it that way?
 
Last edited:

twoskinsonemanns

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
2,326
Location
WV
my post didn't violate rule 6.
I understand that posts can be deleted for any reason but I prefer honesty about why they are deleted.
Also for the sake of retaining respectability I hope you are so overly sensitive to jokes about all religions.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
my post didn't violate rule 6.
I understand that posts can be deleted for any reason but I prefer honesty about why they are deleted.
Also for the sake of retaining respectability I hope you are so overly sensitive to jokes about all religions.

Exerpted from rule #6 - .....bashing of groups of people based upon......religion

You capitalized G~d twice, that makes it a proper noun, name.

Even if intended to be humorous, considered it very poor taste, mocking even, on a thread about a day very special to Christians.

Overly sensitive? Nope, but yes I am equally intolerant of less than thoughtful remarks about other beliefs/religions, including Islam wherein some of the people have become our enemies and others have not.

BTW - when someone questions my decisions by PM, I respond in kind. When a question is raised on open forum, I reply accordingly so that others may understand. You received neither reprimand nor infraction points, so I think it might be better to just be a little more sensitive to what is said and where - no more intended than that. I bear you no animosity at all.
 
Last edited:

twoskinsonemanns

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
2,326
Location
WV
Exerpted from rule #6 - .....bashing of groups of people based upon......religion

You capitalized G~d twice, that makes it a proper noun, name.

Even if intended to be humorous, considered it very poor taste, mocking even, on a thread about a day very special to Christians.

Overly sensitive? Nope, but yes I am equally intolerant of less than thoughtful remarks about other beliefs/religions, including Islam wherein some of the people have become our enemies and others have not.

BTW - when someone questions my decisions by PM, I respond in kind. When a question is raised on open forum, I reply accordingly so that others may understand. You received neither reprimand nor infraction points, so I think it might be better to just be a little more sensitive to what is said and where - no more intended than that. I bear you no animosity at all.

It was only good-willed humor. It's hard to imagine it being received as bashing but to those offended I do apologize.
 
Top