Firearms Iinstuctor
Regular Member
yes congratulations to you in Texas
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
HB 910 - Licensed Open Carry - Officially Passed Out of Texas House of Representative
- Thread starter Ian
- Start date
mustangkiller
Regular Member
Pardon my French and mods, edit as needed but.......**** YEAH! it passed....on to Abbotts desk!!!!!!
Ian
Lone Star Veteran
I'm sorry I missed it, had a meeting at work. Woohoo everyone! I can't believe this.
Last edited:
carstensxd45
New member
Well I'll be! !!
mustangkiller
Regular Member
Now, who was it that said we were dumb for having hope? Someone pistol whip that guy hahaha I kid, I kid
nonameisgood
Regular Member
If/when Abbott signs, it will be effective January 1, 2016.
The Dark Reaper
New member
so now how long will it take to get to the Governor's desk??
buchschacher
New member
So does a drop leg holster count as a belt holster? It attaches to the belt.
77zach
Regular Member
Wow. Logic and liberty prevailed. Nice
mustangkiller
Regular Member
Lets take a pause here fellas. According to my convo on FB with "Mr. Dan Patrick" A9 wasn't word for word what the house sent over. It needs to go back just to be sure they concur. Start praying time doesn't run out.
Last edited:
The Dark Reaper
New member
I would think so if it attaches to a belt
77zach
Regular Member
That's what Texas Carry said as well. Could be intentional as that's pretty incompetent.
buchschacher
New member
I watched the whole thing. I do not believe that is correct. It passed. The author of the amendment said it was word for word.
mustangkiller
Regular Member
I could have sworn he said that too. But whoever controls Dan Patricks FB account says otherwise. Go look at it. Its public.
nonameisgood
Regular Member
Well, if amendments are like the bills, "same wording" isn't the same as "same amendment." This does not surprise me in the least, except that it makes someone a liar* when he said "it will go straight to the governor without conference if the amendment is adopted and the bill passes." Estes official opposed amendment 9, and said that was because he felt it would jeopardize passage.
*i use the word "liar" because I presume our esteemed senators know the rules and would not make a simple, obvious mistake. (Realizing that they obviously play games and pretend to make mistakes when doing so benefits them.)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
*i use the word "liar" because I presume our esteemed senators know the rules and would not make a simple, obvious mistake. (Realizing that they obviously play games and pretend to make mistakes when doing so benefits them.)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
77zach
Regular Member
TX carry is in the building and they're reporting a one word discrepancy for what it's worth.
buchschacher
New member
Then why does it say passed?
mustangkiller
Regular Member
Wth? What's your source? Where can we follow this?
nonameisgood
Regular Member
It passed the senate, but if the bill was amended by the senate (it was), discrepancies must be resolved by a conference committee.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JWPA1
Regular Member
If its a one word discrepency id like to argue the germaness of holding it back from gov abbot any longer. one word is a ludicrous reason to keep it from being sent to his desk!