Found the video. It was ~0.2 seconds, but the OC was at the 4-5 clock while the CC was at the 1-2 clock position with a loose shirt over it (I carry open or concealed at the 1-2 clock position and imo any tests should be done from where you would carry. He also says that the OC is at the 3 o'clock position but if you look it's clear that it is past that, which can slow someone down). He also gives the standard BS excuse for why OC=bad and even extends it to being bad in one's home. As I said, I'm not a fan of him and I feel the video is bleh for various reasons, but it's the only one I know of that shows a time difference measured via a shot timer.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...carry-pincus-on-the-open-vs-concealed-debate/
Errors in Rob Pincus video:
1. "The typical 3 or 4 o'clock position." OC is typically at 3 o'clock, but he's carrying it at his 4 to 5 o'clock position.
2. "When they look over there, then I can go for my firearm." Wrong. If someone bursts into your home, you go for your firearm STAT.
3. "If they see it, they know that I am armed, they know that I have a lethal potential means of defending myself, maybe they decide to shoot me right away..." blah, blah, "...and now I've lost the opportunity to protect my family." Rob Pincus is living in a dream world. He has WAY over-thought this and concludes that "open carry is a disadvantage inside the home. It takes away your tactical advantage..."
I'm going to stop right there because he starts in with the CCer's "tactical advantage" B.S. they must dredge from the septic tank every time they get together in their knitting circles.
Rob: Someone busts into your home waving a gun in your face. Your first move is to drop them dead. Every second you wait greatly increases the likelihood they'll start pulling the trigger.
Rob: Someone busts into your home and starts firing. Your first move is to drop them dead. But Oh, wait! You can't, because they just shot you in your left arm, on which you were relying to pull up your shirt so you can draw your weapon and BANG! The perp's second round went through your head.
Rob Pincus sounds good, but he's not too bright. He's a walking poster child for Qui-gon Jin's comment, "The ability to speak does not make one intelligent." The "element of surprise" he keeps blathering on about is an advantage only when YOU are the one on the offense. The element of surprise is NOT a defensive asset. It's almost always a defensive liability for one simple reason: It requires yet another step, which takes time, greatly reducing the odds of a favorable outcome.
Time to put this his crappy concepts back on ICE.