Personally, I think you're a pretty poor representative for OC. Your language and demeanor during this encounter are appalling. It surely looks like your main objective was to provoke a response, or more likely an over response, from the officer.
Truthfully, by the end of the video I was kind of wishing you'd get what you wanted. Maybe a skull fracture would let in a few manners and a little common sense and decency.
I agree Rogue
could have been more polished.
But, I simply cannot find anything in the Bill of Rights that says rights have to be exercised politely.*
I remember a knucklehead here on the forum a few years ago (now banned). I got the distinct impression he went looking for trouble from police. Openly carried a cap-and-ball revolver in his hand, carried some long arms. Lots of things about him to disapprove of. But, while I personally disapproved of what he was doing, I recognized his right to do it transcended my personal disapproval, and supported him.
Rights are rights are rights are rights.
*The one exception to this would be the First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances. A petition in this context is by definition respectful.
ETA: Let me add something. I want to say this very, very carefully so nobody goes adding meaning that isn't there. Before anybody goes too far into supporting ARADCOM, lets just keep in mind that ARADCOM is openly supporting Rogue receiving potentially lethal force for a manners violation. Meaning, don't forget to compare Rogue's coarse language to ARADCOM's pleasure at the thought of Rogue receiving
actual force to teach him manners.
Also, since it would be illegal for the cop to fracture Rogue's skull, ARADCOM's post tends in the direction of violating the forum rule that we advocate only for the law-abiding.
ETA2: ARADCOM clarified his post for me. See post #20 below.