I'm pretty sure that Mike and John (the personal part of the entity known as OCD
rg) will not be bringing the organization into whatever discussion ensues. That does not mean that they may not personally be upset by the incident, or will not allow discussion of the incident, or refuse to allow "members" to use the forum to discuss the incident and/or any responses to what happened/what may follow next.
All of which I am personally grateful and thankful for.
One of the big problems I see regarding this recording of incidents in Oregon (as best I understood what they were saying in the intro) is that it was not the same officer confronting the same individuals in the same location. (It seems to me one was a police officer and the other was a sherrif's deputy, which bolsters the different locations/different policies/different attitudes argument.)
In the first incident I saw an officer who did not immediately pull his duty weapon because he wanted to satisfy his professional (and perhaps personal) curiosity about why something fairly unusual was taking place. In the second incident the deputy chose to immediately pull his duty weapon, which I am presuming was because he saw the mere presence of the AR as a threat. Yet once the second guy was separated from his AR (for officer safety? [/sarcasm]) he was not handcuffed but led onto the sidewalk where it appeared a conversation was begun. Which leads me to consider that the departmental culture is not "ZOMG He's got a gun!!ELEVENTY!!"
Much like the TV news we are given heavily edited clips that support a particular ideology, whether that be that blood/fear raises ratings or that cops are all anti-2A/anti-gun. I withold judgement until I know more about how both incidents played out - and that includes resolving any complaints that might have been filed. (Strange attitude, that, from someone who has been persecuted and prosecuted, no? Especially when you know that the experiences did not make me afraid of the cops.)
stay safe.