I am not sure it has too...
The ruling is about marriage rights, the court did not even cite any gun references, IMO, it is laughable to take that leap. And anybody suggesting so is pushing for someone else to be a test case. I find this behavior repulsive, if the author of the article wants to be a test case he should step up to the plate, and not give bad legal advice.
Maybe Bob will travel to DC and declare he is carrying concealed, and we can see how that works out for him.
I am not sure that SCOTUS has to call out or reference guns, open carry or reciprocity at all according to this article. In fact, while the ruling is around "gay marriage" it sites the constitution to justify that (if I read it correctly) that if one state recognizes a right, another state cannot deny you that same right:
"No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
By using the Constitution in such a manner, the Court argues that the Due Process Clause extends “certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy” accepted in a majority of states across the state lines of a handful of states that still banned the practice.
The vast majority of states are “shall issue” on the matter of issuing concealed carry permits, and enjoy reciprocity with a large number of other states.
My North Carolina concealed carry permit, for example, was recognized yesterday as being valid in 36 states, which just so happened to be the number of states in which gay marriage was legal yesterday. But 14 states did not recognize my concealed carry permit yesterday.
Today they must.
Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia."
I could be wrong, but "wow" if this is correct, what a historic decision indeed!