i concede...and learned sumthin in the process...
http://askthetrucker.com/cdl-federal-gun-law/
thanks WW..
ipse
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Latest SCOTUS decisions brings Reciprocity?
- Thread starter HeesBonafide
- Start date
i concede...and learned sumthin in the process...
http://askthetrucker.com/cdl-federal-gun-law/
thanks WW..
ipse
No concession needed, that is a bonus that is awarded to those that keep their mind open and receptive.
WalkingWolf
Regular Member
Actually that is exactly what you did when I questioned the author's motives. This is a snip from your response.
My North Carolina concealed carry permit, for example, was recognized yesterday as being valid in 36 states, which just so happened to be the number of states in which gay marriage was legal yesterday. But 14 states did not recognize my concealed carry permit yesterday.
HeesBonafide
Regular Member
That wasn't me
Ahh.. that explains a lot.
That wasn't me that was stating that...that was the author of the article who stated that. That is why I used, "quotes" in my post, to try to show the conversation of what someone else wrote versus my comment.
I hope that this clears up any possible confusion.
btw, I don't live in NC either...
Ahh.. that explains a lot.
That wasn't me that was stating that...that was the author of the article who stated that. That is why I used, "quotes" in my post, to try to show the conversation of what someone else wrote versus my comment.
I hope that this clears up any possible confusion.
btw, I don't live in NC either...
Actually I think it's more likely for unlicensed open carry to eventually become nationalized. The fed circuit court in Colorado, if I recall correctly, stated that OC is inherent to the 2nd Amendment.
In the recent 9th circuit court ruling I think one of the court's statements were that CA had banned open carry and with the super stingy "may issue" was effectively banning conceal carry, so because of 2A they had to offer SOME kind of carry.
Indeed it is impossible to read through the 2A and not realize the word "bear" refers to carry. My bet is eventually the SCOTUS might rule that unlicensed OC is federally protected everywhere but CC would still require licenses or be allowed to be banned as long as OC was allowed.
In the recent 9th circuit court ruling I think one of the court's statements were that CA had banned open carry and with the super stingy "may issue" was effectively banning conceal carry, so because of 2A they had to offer SOME kind of carry.
Indeed it is impossible to read through the 2A and not realize the word "bear" refers to carry. My bet is eventually the SCOTUS might rule that unlicensed OC is federally protected everywhere but CC would still require licenses or be allowed to be banned as long as OC was allowed.
WalkingWolf
Regular Member
I found it hard, and confusing of where he was quoting, and using his own words. The phrase I pulled was not quoted, and there were spaces between each quote, that leaves a big hole. It is simple when doing a quote in that manner use quotations at every paragraph, or where each line is spaced. Or use the italics feature we are accustomed to. The OP also had the option to put a disclaimer, as others as well as myself have done, when being a messenger.
Lord help you if you forget to Quote or (") even when you show the source w/explanation - someone will accuse you of plagiarism, stealing what belongs to someone else.
Did I say even w/cite source and after explanation? Yep, sure did.
That came home to me. Did it bother me? Nope, not one scintilla.
Did I say even w/cite source and after explanation? Yep, sure did.
That came home to me. Did it bother me? Nope, not one scintilla.
WalkingWolf
Regular Member
When you were accused it was downright silly, it is not as if a (") was forgotten in this case, it was misleading, though probably not intentional. To get a message across clearly, it should start out clear to begin with.
If I remember correctly I gave a double cite. Was quoting from a VCDL Va-Alert and showed the original source.
There are a few that like to try and snipe me, but the flash gives away their position :lol:
HeesBonafide
Regular Member
NRA does NOT believe that this means reciprocity
Thought that some may appreciate this article. The NRA does not believe that the SCOTUS ruling provides reciprocity:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/201...ion-with-national-concealed-carry-reciprocity
Thought that some may appreciate this article. The NRA does not believe that the SCOTUS ruling provides reciprocity:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/201...ion-with-national-concealed-carry-reciprocity
KBCraig
Regular Member
SCOTUS has ruled that marriage is a fundamental right at least 14 times, dating back to 1888. The Obergefell case recognized that case history and properly applied the 14th Amendment to make sure that fundamental right applies to all, without discrimination.
We should have the same kind of case law for 2A, but we don't... if we did, we wouldn't have NFA'34, GCA'68, or any other federal gun control. Not to mention, most state gun control would be invalidated.
We should have the same kind of case law for 2A, but we don't... if we did, we wouldn't have NFA'34, GCA'68, or any other federal gun control. Not to mention, most state gun control would be invalidated.
Freedom1Man
Regular Member
How can it be a right if it requires a license?