I was kinda suspecting such phones would mean they would actually have to stop and evaluate an encounter by comparing to AOJ (ability, opportunity, jeopardy/intent--the elements of justified lethal force.) Such police complaints just say, in so many words, "we want to be able to shoot without actually having to stop, look, and evaluate." These phones would tend to put a crimp in the too-often offered generic explanation that the officer felt in fear for his life. If these phones become a little bit common-place, those particular police who would otherwise just shoot would have to do what the rest of us have to do--actually apply AOJ.Such argument of course is nonsense. Some cops really can't tell when somebody is holding their "gun" to their ear, and talking into it? Or, texting on it?Or, are they really just opposed to something making their job harder, because, now, for example, in Washington DC, they can't just assume anybody with a "gun" sticking out of their pocket is a criminal? Uh-oh. There went their automatic RAS.