Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: National Rifle Association Drops Lawsuit against San Francisco

  1. #1
    Regular Member California Right To Carry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    United States

    National Rifle Association Drops Lawsuit against San Francisco

    A draft of my press release ->

    The Jackson v. San Francisco page at my website ->

    Update September 1, 2015 by Charles Nichols President of California Right To Carry Pursuant to the Order of the court dated August 14, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed an Unopposed Request to Dismiss Case and a Proposed Order to Dismiss the Case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(2). Unless the district court judge decides otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice which means that the Plaintiffs can refile their lawsuit at a later date. If the district court judge decides to dismiss the case with prejudice then the Plaintiffs would have to file an immediate appeal of the dismissal with prejudice. If they did not appeal then the Plaintiffs would not be able to challenge the law in the future. This lawsuit was filed on May 5, 2009. Between the initial filing of the Complaint and the Unopposed Request by the Plaintiffs to dismiss the case there are 167 docket entries (inclusive) and the lawsuit never made it past the denial of a preliminary injunction and that took over six years.

    Unless the current US Supreme Court indicates a willingness to hear Second Amendment cases absent a circuit split for the justices to resolve, the lower courts will continue to pretend the Heller and McDonald decisions never happened. If Stare Decisis did not apply to this case then there is no such thing as Stare Decisis. The inferior courts are free to ignore binding precedents.

    Fortunately, if I should lose my California Open Carry case on appeal then my loss will create multiple circuit splits, and not just on the Second Amendment. Were SCOTUS to deny my cert petition then the only thing left to conclude is that the high court is done with the Second Amendment.

    Links to the documents are at my website.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 09-16-2015 at 07:42 PM. Reason: rule #19
    Concealed carry is of no use to me, I don't carry a purse.

    Charles Nichols President of California Right To Carry

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    earth's crust
    The court can rule whatever it wants it does not change facts.

    But we got deadlines to pay our taxes .... these thieves in robes ... I'm gonna go up the steps of the SCOTUS bldg and air my grievances .. (huh....I cannot do freaking that! who said so....JUDGES..those rat bastages)

    Good luck in your case ...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts