We actually do require the law to be posted when someone starts making claims about certain things. When a person cannot back up what they are claiming, if they continue arguing an invalid point after being requested to cite their source, they are then removed. A recent case was in regards to carrying at the DMV. A person could not cite where it was illegal to open carry there and he was removed from the page because he continued arguing about it. We do not allow false information of unbacked claims to to stay on our page.
As to the admins, we do cite the NRS as needed. So I am not sure what groups you have been involved in but it wasn't ours or any other the others that have the same admins.
The Gentleman who started one of the FB pages you admin on, has been a guest in my home. I installed an ambidextrous slide lock safety on his 1911, among other things. While in the shop, we discussed extensively the birth of the page as well as the transformation. The agenda driven misinformation rose to the top of our conversation. My friend expressed sincere exasperation that his page was being run that way. He asked me for advice, regarding the issue. I volunteered to assist and corresponded with him by email for a couple months afterward.
I started actively addressing the misinformation with the fb admins, starting with the NLV weapon in the car statute. When I correctly stated "NLV Muni court is a court of non record," a contested trial has no weight according to NRS, Requiring a
"Trial De Nova"The admins and their "enforcers" Jumped on me high school style. When I posted the NRS, It was scoffed, dismissed as inaccurate, and taken down. I was threatened with expulsion from the page, and told to "behave myself by admin E.L.
The one cite I did see in response to my post from an admin was hilarious. It was a Sheriffs and Chiefs situation, I don't recall the exact disagreement, however the best part was when the "Legal Expert" Admin responded with "It is obvious you have never read Stilwell V. Nevada Sheriffs and Chiefs." He did not produce a quote from the case. There was nothing in the case to support his claim. He was pathetically unaware, that not only had I read the case, I assembled the case, and I lived the case, My name is Stilwell, I sued the NSCA. R.R. made a gigantic fool of himself, citing my case without merit, or knowledge he was conversing with the plaintiff of the case he was using as a bluff. I kept the high ground, and never let on, who I was. I did laugh however.
Sometimes there is nothing to cite, I brought up the well known (on here anyway) fact that CC is not legal even in your own bathroom without a permit. I was attacked again by the "Legal Expert" the admins and their enforcers. I was instructed to provide a law substantiating my claim. When I provided the NRS the "click" got nasty, saying it does not mention your house etc, I pointed out that your house was not listed in the exemptions, therefor it was included in the prohibition. They scoffed and made fun of my information deleting the citations, and after they played high school, the thread.
There are many more incidences where people with valid points are abused. My son (who probably wont be on the page long since I revealed my name, lol) told me that a couple of days ago a Lady OC'er mentioned her dislike of a Meme posted by a admin, that she viewed as degrading to women. When she stood her ground after the usual barrage, the thread was removed. He looked in the members for her and she was gone.
It is obvious that the fb OC pages have a large law enforcement presence I take no issue with anyone's involvement, but it seems odd how LEO's are prevented by their Dept. from OC out of uniform, yet feel the need to be so active in the OC community.
A Phone call I had with one of the "enforcers" (K.E.)on the page was revealing. He told me that certain admins were on that page looking for any kind of violation they could find, or get a confession to (knowingly, or not) and reporting to the cops. He bragged about how many people that had been arrested (entrapped?) due to the page. He admitted they were all minor ticky-tac things. (Possibly CCW in your own home?)
The last thing I am, is some dingbat dude who does not realize what fb page he is on. I think an apology fromCrafty mommy is due, as she claimed incorrectly, without facts, I was misleading this group about what page I was on, and whom I was talking to. This accusatory style of bullying is prevalent on fb. I wont even ask CM to cite the facts known to her that would lead her to believe I was on a different page, I know better.