Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Colorado Sheriffs Have Their Day in Court

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    32

    Colorado Sheriffs Have Their Day in Court

    http://denver.cbslocal.com/2015/09/2...medium=twitter

    A group of sheriffs from different Colorado counties are moving forward with their fight to repeal stricter state gun laws put in place three years ago.

    Those laws limit the capacity of ammunition magazines and expand background checks on gun purchases in Colorado.

    Sheriffs like Garfield County Sheriff Lou Vallario say they are committed to fighting to protect what they say is citizens’ Second Amendment rights.
    Let's hope that we can get some relief here in Colorado on the magazine ban at the very least.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 03-26-2016 at 08:17 AM. Reason: Rule #11 - FUQ only please

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Larimer County, CO
    Posts
    212

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Jefferson County, CO
    Posts
    260
    Well, we didn't win it all, but at least we got part of the original ruling removed.

    Still, I'm doing my part to get Hickenlooper removed next term.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by jackrockblc View Post
    Well, we didn't win it all, but at least we got part of the original ruling removed.

    Still, I'm doing my part to get Hickenlooper removed next term.
    That should be easy since he's term limited.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Its called standing.

    How many cases have I seen kicked out due to lack of standing.

    And many even I could see that they did not have standing.

    Oh well.

  6. #6
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,787
    Sadly, Coloradans elected/appointed a bunch of Constitutional MORONS to office. They cannot fathom the fact that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" means that this right SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

    These Demoncraps claim that a lawsuit "failed to show harm."

    Lady (I'm speaking to chief CO Moron in Charge, Colorado Attorney General Cynthia Coffman), We the People DO NOT have to "show harm" to file lawsuit for a violation of rights. Throughout the history of the United States of America, "harm" has NEVER been a criteria of Constitutional rights violations. It is simply enough to show that one's rights were violated. Case in point: Rosa Parks.

    If you don't know this, you are in the WRONG job.
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and our United States Constitution, and help We the People protect ourselves in the spirit of our Declaration of Independence.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    name one state where they don't vote in (not morons) commies.

  8. #8
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    12,273
    The sheriffs shudda arrested the judge(s) for upholding a prior unconstitutional restraint. The legislature could then work the issue out between the executive and judicial branches.
    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.

    "Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.
    It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare

  9. #9
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,787

    Maketa indicted for 2nd-degree kidnapping, extortion, and much more

    Did you read about this? The article came out today (May 25, 2016), and is from Denver Channel 7 (ABC).

    What do you think? Deserved, or just political fallout for getting the chief of the Black Forest Fire Department fired?

    Could this be the Colorado Libturdical Society's way of getting back at a staunch Constitutional supporter, particularly the Second Amendment?
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and our United States Constitution, and help We the People protect ourselves in the spirit of our Declaration of Independence.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    We don't have "official misconduct" in my state ... too bad.

    Sheriff is usually a political position ...

    So we'll see if any of the dirt sticks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •