Repeater
Regular Member
It's true that every vote counts, especially in a 4-way race for State Senate, but it really seems Glen Sturtevant have proven himself a weak, scared candidate. The Richmond Times-Dispatch article is quite revealing:
Outside money on both sides of gun control debate elevates issue in 10th Senate District race
It's bad enough that Matt Brown, Sturtevant’s campaign manager, [strike]lied[/strike] misspoke about Philip Van Cleave "supporting" Sturtevant, but the most damning comment is actually from Lori Hass, who said, "Sturtevant is running away from his NRA endorsement."
That's true; he really is. He would rather change the subject, or bleat the usual Establishment "Enforce existing gun laws" line.
Honestly, if he's too scared to defend the RKBA while campaigning, how can anyone trust him to defend the RKBA in the Senate when things get really tough?
Under the circumstances, should voters in the 10th who care about gun rights vote for Sturtevant, or Loser, or maybe not vote at all?
Outside money on both sides of gun control debate elevates issue in 10th Senate District race
It's bad enough that Matt Brown, Sturtevant’s campaign manager, [strike]lied[/strike] misspoke about Philip Van Cleave "supporting" Sturtevant, but the most damning comment is actually from Lori Hass, who said, "Sturtevant is running away from his NRA endorsement."
That's true; he really is. He would rather change the subject, or bleat the usual Establishment "Enforce existing gun laws" line.
Honestly, if he's too scared to defend the RKBA while campaigning, how can anyone trust him to defend the RKBA in the Senate when things get really tough?
Under the circumstances, should voters in the 10th who care about gun rights vote for Sturtevant, or Loser, or maybe not vote at all?