Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40

Thread: Vet Admin hospital bans saying Merry Christmas

  1. #1
    Regular Member HPmatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,437

    Vet Admin hospital bans saying Merry Christmas

    From Breitbart - Thank goodness the VA is now focused - like a laser -on providing the best medical care to veterans....



    ...the “Executive Leadership Team” at the Salem VA Medical Center banned Christmas trees, as well as other Christian speech and celebrations. As reported by local media, an email sent by senior staff to the center’s employees reads in part:

    …Public areas may only be decorated in a manner that is celebratory of the winter season. Displays must not promote any religion. Please note that trees (regardless of the types of ornaments used) have been deemed to promote the Christian religion and will not be permitted in any public areas this year.

    Just hours ago, pressure from the center’s employees caused the management team to cave on the Christmas tree ban. Christmas trees are back in at the facility.

    However, the email goes on to say that private religious expressions can only be uttered in “personal work areas.” That means employees can only speak freely in places where the public usually cannot enter and, even then, only if the recipient would clearly understand that the speaker is speaking in his personal capacity only.

    In other words, an employee could be punished for wishing “Merry Christmas” to a veteran in the lobby or any other public area.



    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...rry-christmas/


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 11-22-2015 at 01:49 PM. Reason: fix title - avoid confusion
    “Men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them"
    -Thomas Hobbes 1651

  2. #2
    Regular Member The Truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Henrico
    Posts
    1,923
    Thread title is a bit misleading... still an interesting situation.
    Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.

    μολὼν λαβέ

    Quote Originally Posted by stealthyeliminator
    So in actuality you have no evidence that anything wrong took place, you only believe that it could be spun to appear wrong. But it hasn't been. The truth has a funny way of coming out with persistence, even if it was spun negatively the truth would find its way because these people will not accept less.
    Quote Originally Posted by WalkingWolf View Post
    The truth causes some people so much pain they can only respond with impotent laughable insults. Life must be rough for those people.

  3. #3
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,280
    One might argue that the bureaucrats are idiots for banning Christmas (in a manner of speaking).

    I think that would fall short, though. The real problem is the bureaucratic tendency to regulate everything, that is, create a policy in the first place.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  4. #4
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Citizen View Post
    --snipped--The real problem is the bureaucratic tendency to regulate everything, that is, create a policy in the first place.
    There is a flip side to that. Some rile at regulations, rules and the enforcement of them, particularly the ones with which they individually and singularly do not agree. Challenging these becomes a preoccupation with no real merit.

    Solo, A Cappella performances are not automatically as melodious/wonderful as some would have you believe.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 11-21-2015 at 05:27 PM. Reason: fixed
    Better to not open your mouth and be thought the fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    16,172
    This will be one of my many Festivus grievances !

  6. #6
    Campaign Veteran MAC702's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    6,295
    Never mind that the trees are pagan, and not Christian.
    "It's not important how many people I've killed. What's important is how I get along with the people who are still alive" - Jimmy the Tulip

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Fayetteville NC
    Posts
    734
    And what is their policy on we veterans wishing each other, or the staff, Merry Christmas while at the facility?

  8. #8
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,280
    Quote Originally Posted by Grapeshot View Post
    There is a flip side to that. Some rile at regulations, rules and the enforcement of them, particularly the ones with which they individually and singularly do not agree. Challenging these becomes a preoccupation with no real merit.

    Solo, A Cappella performances are not automatically as melodious/wonderful as some would have you believe.
    Two questions.

    1. Who exactly are these some?

    2. Who exactly are the solo, a cappella performers?
    Last edited by Citizen; 11-21-2015 at 09:44 PM.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  9. #9
    Accomplished Advocate color of law's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,528
    When I was a young lad I was exempt from the Vietnam war in the draft lottery. My mummy said if I volunteered anyway I would get VA benefits, but I would not be allowed to say Merry Christmas. Or not volunteer and be eligible for Hillery Care.

    Boy, was she ever wrong.

  10. #10
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,254
    Quote Originally Posted by MAC702 View Post
    Never mind that the trees are pagan, and not Christian.

    sure throw that into the mix...

    awaiting for the discussion from 'he who shall not be named' to embellish how the tree was saved and now a viable decoration for the christian holidays... (sarcasm, sorta)

    ipse
    Last edited by solus; 11-21-2015 at 11:01 PM.
    "He who pays the piper calls the tunes..." (OBE as Grape called melody!!)

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  11. #11
    Campaign Veteran skidmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Chesterfield VA
    Posts
    10,450
    I notice that this is all being directed at the Christians. (Not all of them, just the annoying ones.)

    You should hear the fairy tales associated with the winter solstice celebrations of other religions. But somehow they are apparently not offensive enough?

    "Christ" has been out of Christmas on a cultural/social level since well before The New York Sun told little Virginia there really is a Santa Claus, or Currier and Ives first came up with the idea of making money selling cards with pictures of families embarrassing them selves wearing matching humiliating sweaters.

    Just for giggles, beat the ban on Christmas trees by claiming it's a Channukah bush - and get video of The Powers That Be when they try to deal with that.

    stay safe.
    "He'll regret it to his dying day....if ever he lives that long."----The Quiet Man

    Because stupidity isn't a race, and everybody can win.

    "No matter how much contempt you have for the media in all this, you don't have enough"
    ----Allahpundit

  12. #12
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,280
    Quote Originally Posted by color of law View Post
    When I was a young lad I was exempt from the Vietnam war in the draft lottery. My mummy said if I volunteered anyway I would get VA benefits, but I would not be allowed to say Merry Christmas. Or not volunteer and be eligible for Hillery Care.

    Boy, was she ever wrong.
    Boy, that is a comment freighted with unsaid meaning.

    +1
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  13. #13
    Campaign Veteran skidmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Chesterfield VA
    Posts
    10,450
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare View Post
    I volunteered in 1969 and am not eligible for VA benefits for means testing. VA benefits are for the least capable only.
    You want to explain that? Especially the last part?

    Regardless of your income (means test) you should be eligible as Category 8 - unless you waited too long before trying to enroll. http://veteransunited.org/vacategories.htm http://www.military.com/benefits/vet...igibility.html

    stay safe.
    "He'll regret it to his dying day....if ever he lives that long."----The Quiet Man

    Because stupidity isn't a race, and everybody can win.

    "No matter how much contempt you have for the media in all this, you don't have enough"
    ----Allahpundit

  14. #14
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    16,690
    Why can't people just take well wishing as well wishing?I don't care if they wish me a merry happy kwanza, satan, allah, yahweh, thor, flying spaghetti monster........I'd say thank you.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  15. #15
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,280
    Quote Originally Posted by sudden valley gunner View Post
    Why can't people just take well wishing as well wishing?I don't care if they wish me a merry happy kwanza, satan, allah, yahweh, thor, flying spaghetti monster........I'd say thank you.
    +1
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  16. #16
    Regular Member DrakeZ07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Lexington, Ky
    Posts
    1,080
    Quote Originally Posted by JTHunter View Post
    This is just another way for this administration to deny and denigrate our religious background.
    Yes because the christian majority in this country is being oppressed and targeted by the government, elected or appointed, who are comprised mostly of christians. Oh the travesty! Persecution! Lion's den! poor widdle you!

    Back to the topic OP post; GOOD! Get rid of all that religious crap. Friggen tax payer money, a tax payer healthcare system, for tax payer paid buildings and staff, treating people who was paid by the tax payers, and now get everything covered by the tax payer when they go there to get tax payer funded medical care. It's a government building, with government staff and employees; Religion has no place in tax payer-funded buildings, and such. But, on the side of caution, if they don't encompass the winter decorations of EVERY. SINGLE. RELIGION. EVER. EXISTED. then NO decorations should be put up. It's like the Oklahoma court house thing, either they allow people to erect monuments and plaques from EVERY RELIGION, or they can't have ANY religious monuments/plaques up at all. I'm an Anti-theist [Someone who vehemently hates religion, and is an atheist to the extremes], I don't want a single darn penny of my tax dollars going to pay for any christian [or for that matter, jewish, muslim, bhuddist, taoist, etc] decorations, nor for said decorations to be put on display on any part of my tax dollar-funded buildings/lands.
    I'm a proud openly gay open carrier~
    Trained SKYWARN spotter, and veteran Storm Chaser.
    =^.^= ~<3~ =^.^=
    Beware the Pink Camo clad gay redneck.

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,061
    Quote Originally Posted by DrakeZ07 View Post
    [bigoted sarcasm redacted]

    Back to the topic OP post; GOOD! Get rid of all that religious crap. Friggen tax payer money, a tax payer healthcare system, for tax payer paid buildings and staff, treating people who was paid by the tax payers, and now get everything covered by the tax payer when they go there to get tax payer funded medical care.
    ...

    [redact small minded, hateful, spiteful, bigotry]

    ...

    I don't want a single darn penny of my tax dollars going to pay for any christian [or for that matter, jewish, muslim, bhuddist, taoist, etc] decorations, nor for said decorations to be put on display on any part of my tax dollar-funded buildings/lands.
    And some have the audacity to claim it is Christians who are hateful? It is really sad to see anyone consumed by such hatred.

    But to the topic at hand...

    A couple of small points about all this "taxpayer" funded concerns.

    1-This is the VA, providing treatment to veterans who EARNED medical care with their military service. (Actually, I think they earned far better than the VA is actually providing, but that is another thread.) This isn't some kind of taxpayer provided welfare/charity. It is an earned benefit.

    2-Most competent medical providers and public health organizations now recognize that attending to a patient's spiritual needs is an important part of their overall medical (physical or mental) care. Put something like "importance of meeting spiritual needs as part of medical care" into your favorite internet search engine for a long list of articles from diverse sources.

    3-Whether showing up for an outpatient test/procedure, or spending significant time, a hospital is not a pleasant place to be in most cases. Some changing in scenery with season-appropriate decorations is a very low cost way to help improve patient moral. Veterans' Day/Thanksgiving, Christmas/Chanukah/New Year's, Easter/Passover, Independence Day, and State/region specific holidays (ie Patriots' Day in April in New England, Founders' Day in Nevada, etc) are fine times to make small changes in décor/decorations and conveniently correspond with Fall, Winter, Spring, and Summer. Whatever the history, each now has significant secular components in addition to religious specific observances. Notably, in addition to the purely secular holidays such as Veterans' and Memorial Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas are both official federal holidays and so would seem to me to be entirely appropriate to recognize in federal facilities.

    Charles
    Last edited by utbagpiper; 11-23-2015 at 01:13 PM.

  18. #18
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,434
    Quote Originally Posted by DrakeZ07 View Post
    Yes because the christian majority in this country is being oppressed and targeted by the government, elected or appointed, who are comprised mostly of christians. Oh the travesty! Persecution! Lion's den! poor widdle you!

    Back to the topic OP post; GOOD! Get rid of all that religious crap. Friggen tax payer money, a tax payer healthcare system, for tax payer paid buildings and staff, treating people who was paid by the tax payers, and now get everything covered by the tax payer when they go there to get tax payer funded medical care. It's a government building, with government staff and employees; Religion has no place in tax payer-funded buildings, and such. But, on the side of caution, if they don't encompass the winter decorations of EVERY. SINGLE. RELIGION. EVER. EXISTED. then NO decorations should be put up. It's like the Oklahoma court house thing, either they allow people to erect monuments and plaques from EVERY RELIGION, or they can't have ANY religious monuments/plaques up at all.
    That's an incredible amount of hatred you packed in there, Drake. What's the source for all your hatred?

    Couple of points:

    1. While the term "Christmas" literally means "Christ's Mass" i.e. the birth of Christ, it has become synonymous with the winter holiday season. I've known many Jewish people who routinely wished me a "Merry Christmas," including one of my best friends in high school, as well as a lady who attends my writer's group. The only two groups who routinely find it offensive are Islamic radicals and atheists. Given the association, this fact doesn't paint either group in a very appealing, much less rational light.

    2. Jefferson's "Separation of church and state" letter to the Danbury Baptists in no way promised or even hinted that it would keep religion out of the government. When you read his letter en toto, his "wall of separation between Church and State" clearly indicates protecting the Church from the State, and not the other way around. In fact, this sentiment was abundantly and repeatedly echoed by many of the other Founding Fathers who unmistakably considering attempting to run the U.S. Government without a firm grounding in Christian and/or Biblical principles to be an exercise of high folly. John Adams wrote, "The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." (Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Washington D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. XIII, p. 292-294. In a letter from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson on June 28, 1813.). With this in mind, Jefferson himself routinely opened up the old Treasury buildings to churchgoers during his Presidency in response to the rapid increase in the D.C. population that outpaced the building industry's ability to erect houses of Christian worship. Jefferson's letter most certainly did, however, reaffirm the First Amendment's prohibition that Congress "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Even more revealing, however, is the letter written by the Danbury Baptists to Thomas Jefferson, along with Jefferson's final word. The Danbury Baptist letter concerned itself with federal meddling in the affairs of churches. Jefferson's response (in full, below), includes the following: "Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem." In short, this means, "I agree with your position, respect it, and assure you a federal encroachment on religious belief will not happen." We must never forget the second part of our First Amendment's protection of religion: "nor prohibit the free exercise thereof." This isn't merely federal law. Amendments are part of the Constitution (Article V), "the supreme Law of the Land" (Article VI). As such, they "shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution" (Article V). Any subsequent federal law, including the directions given by Department of VA staffers, must fall in line with the mandate that "Congress shall make no law ... prohibiting the free exercise (of religion)." If it does not, then the directives given by such directors and staffers directly violates the Constitutional rights of its employees.

    As utbagpiper correctly noted, not only are the taxpayer dollars spent on the VA very well-earned by those who risked all for their country, but meeting the spiritual needs of patients is critical to their overall care.

    I'm an Anti-theist [Someone who vehemently hates religion, and is an atheist to the extremes], I don't want a single darn penny of my tax dollars going to pay for any christian [or for that matter, jewish, muslim, bhuddist, taoist, etc] decorations, nor for said decorations to be put on display on any part of my tax dollar-funded buildings/lands.
    To cop a quote: "Oh the travesty! Persecution! Lion's den! poor widdle you!"

    Seriously, Drake, We the People do not agree with you: "A 2008 survey of 1,000 people concluded that, based on their stated beliefs rather than their religious identification, 69.5% of Americans believe in a personal God, roughly 12.3% of Americans are atheist or agnostic, and another 12.1% are deistic (believing in a higher power/non-personal God, but no personal God)." Furthermore, "Most of the 50 affiliations cited are Christian denominations, ranging from the Assembly of God to the United Church of Christ. Added up they show that 53 percent of Americans are Protestants, 22 percent Catholics and 8 percent other Christians, such as Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses. Protestant Groups."

    That's 83% of Americans who are Christians.

    Our country is a Republic, not a Democracy. If we attempted to appease every minority, we'd have to flip coins to chose which minority ruled, as many of them are on conflict with one another. Freedom of religion remains one of the most valuable foundations of our country.

    If you don't like it, I suggest that instead of trying to shove your 1% view, "an atheist to the extremes," down everyone else's throats, you wake up, realize we were founded as a Christian nation, remain a predominantly Christian nation, and you either chose to live here peaceably or move to either the Czech Republic or Estonia:

    "According to Pew Research Center survey in 2012 religiously unaffiliated (include agnostic and atheist) make up about 18.2% of Europeans population. According to the same survey religiously unaffiliated make up a majority of the population only in two European countries: Czech Republic (75%) and Estonia (60%)." Other sources indicate China and Japan outpace the Czech Republic.

    You'll be much happier there than amongst all us Christians.
    Last edited by since9; 11-23-2015 at 02:42 PM.
    I no longer have any confidence in the moderation or administration of this forum. Nonetheless, the First STILL protects the Second, and the Second protects the First! Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and other founding documents. If you're going to do anything at all, do it right!

  19. #19
    Regular Member J_dazzle23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    643
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    That's an incredible amount of hatred you packed in there, Drake. What's the source for all your hatred?

    Couple of points:

    1. While the term "Christmas" literally means "Christ's Mass" i.e. the birth of Christ, it has become synonymous with the winter holiday season. I've known many Jewish people who routinely wished me a "Merry Christmas," including one of my best friends in high school, as well as a lady who attends my writer's group. The only two groups who routinely find it offensive are Islamic radicals and atheists. Given the association, this fact doesn't paint either group in a very appealing, much less rational light.

    2. Jefferson's "Separation of church and state" letter to the Danbury Baptists in no way promised or even hinted that it would keep religion out of the government. When you read his letter en toto, his "wall of separation between Church and State" clearly indicates protecting the Church from the State, and not the other way around. In fact, this sentiment was abundantly and repeatedly echoed by many of the other Founding Fathers who unmistakably considering attempting to run the U.S. Government without a firm grounding in Christian and/or Biblical principles to be an exercise of high folly. John Adams wrote, "The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God." (Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson (Washington D. C.: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. XIII, p. 292-294. In a letter from John Adams to Thomas Jefferson on June 28, 1813.). With this in mind, Jefferson himself routinely opened up the old Treasury buildings to churchgoers during his Presidency in response to the rapid increase in the D.C. population that outpaced the building industry's ability to erect houses of Christian worship. Jefferson's letter most certainly did, however, reaffirm the First Amendment's prohibition that Congress "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Even more revealing, however, is the letter written by the Danbury Baptists to Thomas Jefferson, along with Jefferson's final word. The Danbury Baptist letter concerned itself with federal meddling in the affairs of churches. Jefferson's response (in full, below), includes the following: "Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties. I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem." In short, this means, "I agree with your position, respect it, and assure you a federal encroachment on religious belief will not happen." We must never forget the second part of our First Amendment's protection of religion: "nor prohibit the free exercise thereof." This isn't merely federal law. Amendments are part of the Constitution (Article V), "the supreme Law of the Land" (Article VI). As such, they "shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution" (Article V). Any subsequent federal law, including the directions given by Department of VA staffers, must fall in line with the mandate that "Congress shall make no law ... prohibiting the free exercise (of religion)." If it does not, then the directives given by such directors and staffers directly violates the Constitutional rights of its employees.

    As utbagpiper correctly noted, not only are the taxpayer dollars spent on the VA very well-earned by those who risked all for their country, but meeting the spiritual needs of patients is critical to their overall care.



    To cop a quote: "Oh the travesty! Persecution! Lion's den! poor widdle you!"

    Seriously, Drake, We the People do not agree with you: "A 2008 survey of 1,000 people concluded that, based on their stated beliefs rather than their religious identification, 69.5% of Americans believe in a personal God, roughly 12.3% of Americans are atheist or agnostic, and another 12.1% are deistic (believing in a higher power/non-personal God, but no personal God)." Furthermore, "Most of the 50 affiliations cited are Christian denominations, ranging from the Assembly of God to the United Church of Christ. Added up they show that 53 percent of Americans are Protestants, 22 percent Catholics and 8 percent other Christians, such as Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses. Protestant Groups."

    That's 83% of Americans who are Christians.

    Our country is a Republic, not a Democracy. If we attempted to appease every minority, we'd have to flip coins to chose which minority ruled, as many of them are on conflict with one another. Freedom of religion remains one of the most valuable foundations of our country.

    If you don't like it, I suggest that instead of trying to shove your 1% view, "an atheist to the extremes," down everyone else's throats, you wake up, realize we were founded as a Christian nation, remain a predominantly Christian nation, and you either chose to live here peaceably or move to either the Czech Republic or Estonia:

    "According to Pew Research Center survey in 2012 religiously unaffiliated (include agnostic and atheist) make up about 18.2% of Europeans population. According to the same survey religiously unaffiliated make up a majority of the population only in two European countries: Czech Republic (75%) and Estonia (60%)." Other sources indicate China and Japan outpace the Czech Republic.

    You'll be much happier there than amongst all us Christians.
    Sorry man. You are talking to a wall. When someone says that they don't mind one religion(Muslims) targeting and killing Christians, it's a lost cause.

    For someone that is In a minority, it's pretty sad to see that individual throwing all Christians into some tiny microcosm of religious folks that have done him wrong. I'm religious, and I don't have anything against him. Not would I care to push my beliefs on others against their will. But hey, I guess I don't matter because of my own beliefs. Go figure.

    By the way, fantastic expose on how separation of church in state really started.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #20
    Regular Member HPmatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,437
    Have yall ever read/seen the Jefferson 'bible' - Smithsonian (a federal taxpayer funded establishment Drake) recently restored it and has copies for sale. Jefferson has the new testament where he cut out all of the non-facts that he thought had crept in to the story of Jesus over time. He laid it out in greek, latin, english and french. TJ was an interesting dude.

    http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-c...bible-5659505/


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    “Men live without other security than what their own strength and their own invention shall furnish them"
    -Thomas Hobbes 1651

  21. #21
    Regular Member DrakeZ07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Lexington, Ky
    Posts
    1,080
    Quote Originally Posted by since9 View Post
    That's an incredible amount of hatred you packed in there, Drake. What's the source for all your hatred?
    *Snipped*
    Why thank you since9! The source, is life experiences. You grow up, live, breath, work, and learn, around incredible sources of unfound hate based on someone's sexuality, and being the target of all that hate from time to time, and it makes you filled with hurt, and hate, for those that brought hurt and hate to you. I do pride myself on my quenching ability to hold such disdain and hate for Religion, and it's spawn, so I appreciate your compliment!
    I'm a proud openly gay open carrier~
    Trained SKYWARN spotter, and veteran Storm Chaser.
    =^.^= ~<3~ =^.^=
    Beware the Pink Camo clad gay redneck.

  22. #22
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,525
    Originally Posted by since9 That's an incredible amount of hatred you packed in there, Drake. What's the source for all your hatred?*Snipped*
    Quote Originally Posted by DrakeZ07 View Post
    Why thank you since9! The source, is life experiences. You grow up, live, breath, work, and learn, around incredible sources of unfound hate based on someone's sexuality, and being the target of all that hate from time to time, and it makes you filled with hurt, and hate, for those that brought hurt and hate to you. I do pride myself on my quenching ability to hold such disdain and hate for Religion, and it's spawn, so I appreciate your compliment!
    Compliment?

    Here I thought it was an query for understanding that which if directly applied/posted here would be a violation of our Forum Rules.

    We are the sum of our parts are we not? (rhetorical)

    Returning you to our regularly scheduled program now = back on topic.
    Better to not open your mouth and be thought the fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  23. #23
    Regular Member solus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    here nc
    Posts
    6,254
    Quote Originally Posted by JTHunter View Post
    Drake seems to have either forgotten, or he has turned a "blind eye" to the fact that this country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, principles that the majority of the citizens have shared - at least up until 30-40 years ago.
    The point is that this administration is controlled and staffed by/with so many NON-Christians and Christian-hating people that there IS a concerted effort to trash those Judeo-Christian principles and substitute a "harvest festival" that virtually nobody in this country has firsthand knowledge about. OR, they substitute some other "religion" that is so filled with hatred and revulsion for anybody and anything not part of their "clique", they bend over backwards to pander to those groups.
    let's see JT, my history book says this great country was founded in July 4, 1776 yet the term Judeo-Christian wasn't used until 1829, which makes it kinda tough JT to make your claim this country was founded on those principles doesn't it?

    further, quote: Some secularists reject the use of "Judeo-Christian" as a code-word for a particular kind of Christian America...unquote.

    finally, quote: Promoting the concept of United States as a Judeo-Christian nation first became a political program in the 1940s, in response to the growth of anti-Semitism in America. unquote.
    per forum mandates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judeo-Christian

    so JT, you might just wish to reevaluate exactly who is espousing hatred against the religions of this country...

    ipse
    "He who pays the piper calls the tunes..." (OBE as Grape called melody!!)

    Please do not get confused between my personality & my attitude. My personality is who I am ~ my attitude depends on who you are and how you act.

    Remember always, do not judge someone because they sin differently than you do!

    Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please. Mark Twain

  24. #24
    Regular Member J_dazzle23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    643
    Quote Originally Posted by solus View Post
    so JT, you might just wish to reevaluate exactly who is espousing hatred against the religions of this country...

    ipse
    Dude. You might disagree but there is only one person here that has more than once said he would like it if (paraphrasing) Muslims killed all the Christians and any other religious people here.





    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  25. #25
    Regular Member rscottie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ashland, Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    599
    Quote Originally Posted by DrakeZ07 View Post
    Why thank you since9! The source, is life experiences. You grow up, live, breath, work, and learn, around incredible sources of unfound hate based on someone's sexuality, and being the target of all that hate from time to time, and it makes you filled with hurt, and hate, for those that brought hurt and hate to you. I do pride myself on my quenching ability to hold such disdain and hate for Religion, and it's spawn, so I appreciate your compliment!
    I am wondering if perhaps you are mistaking disagreement with your lifestyle as being hatred of you?

    I ask because the Christians I know do not hate homosexual people.


    Sent from my Sony Xperia using Tapatalk 4

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •